[ad_1]
1:45 pm
Tuesday 19 January 2021
Books – Muhammad Sami:
Ahmed Mahran, the cassation lawyer and author of the reconciliation initiative between the two married couples, in what he called the “marriage of experience”, commented that it conforms in form and substance to what came in the statement of Al- Azhar that marriage for a fixed period is prohibited under Sharia, and sympathizes with what came in the Egyptian Dar Al Iftaa’s statement that it is not permissible and against Sharia. Restrict the husband’s right to divorce for a specified period.
He said that the statement from Al-Azhar and Dar Al Iftaa speak of a marriage fixed for a certain period, but the two statements issued are far from the initiative I am asking for, which is a reconciliation contract between two married couples who are about to to divorce in an attempt to reunite the family and preserve its entity from dispersion and collapse.
The Egyptian Dar al-Iftaa called on all segments of society not to be carried away by the calls of modernity of the terminology in the marriage contract, whose folds lie in the love of appearance, fame and destabilizing values, which generates confusion in society, and adversely affects the meaning of the stability of the Egyptian family and the cohesion of the State, which is what we have defended. .
In a statement commenting on the invitations of what is called a “trial marriage”, the house affirmed that this new term for the marriage contract, despite its recent name, carries negative meanings alien to the values of the Egyptian religious society that rejects which contradicts Sharia or social values. Marriage in Islam is a protected contract, which the Noble Sharia has glorified and made valid by the fulfillment of its conditions and pillars and the absence of its impediments, as is the case with all other contracts.
Mahran added, in a statement to Masrawy, that the contract submitted by him is clear from his title that he has concluded an agreement on a joint marriage contract and wrote in the introductory clause at the beginning of the contract that the two parties are in a legal contract. based on the Book of God and the Sunnah of His Messenger. They were married 4 years ago, a complete marriage with witnesses and a guardian, and that in the terms of the contract it was established that it was a contract for the continuation of married life and the acceptance of the wife to return to the conjugal home and live again the experience of life with the husband after she wanted to divorce him, but her return to the continuation of her married life depended on several requests for her, which were written in a reconciliation contract with the aim of the return of the wife . For the home of married life, but many people were misunderstood and mistakenly reported that what was published a marriage contract was contrary to the truth.
Mahran noted that the initiative is a noble goal aimed at reuniting the Egyptian family and that choosing the title of the initiative “marriage experience” has intentions, the first of which is that marriage in its reality is nothing more than an experience of life and social life, and that the wife seeking divorce should try the idea of giving the husband another chance for the marriage to go on and on. Stability within the family does not mean that some understand it.
Mahran assured that he did not aim for fame because he is not a stranger, and that what he did, as he himself described it, was an attempt on his part to contribute with the state to find a new solution outside the box to reduce the phenomenon. of divorce, concluding: I am still working out my idea based on writing a reconciliation contract between the spouses is something other than It is against the law and Sharia.