[ad_1]
The United States wishes to set a precedent in this regard, as there is no international consensus on extraterritorial property rights. Washington’s views on the matter contrast with those adopted by its two main rivals in the invasion of space, Russia and China.
The international treaty on space signed in 1967 lacks precision in this regard, and it was stated that "National seizure by declaration of sovereignty, use or any other means" Prohibited.
The United States explained in the context of the agreements "Sagebrush" Reserves the right to create "Security areas" Protect your activities on an astronomical object. And the"Sagebrush" It is the program back to the moon with two astronauts who will be sent in 2024.
And Mike Gould confirmed that these new activities will take place "In accordance with the provisions of the space treaty", Indicating "It is important that the United States leads not only on the technology front, but also on the political front".
“>
“It’s really amazing that we can buy lunar wealth from 4 companies at a price of $ 25,000 and $ 1 total,” said the agency’s program officer, Phil McAllister.
In exchange for the advancements, Lunar Outpost ($ 1), I-Space’s Japanese and European subsidiaries ($ 5,000 each) and Mastin Space Systems ($ 15,000) will manage to reach the moon and take soil samples. Photographed and transferred to NASA upon return to Earth.
These companies will send their vehicles to collect samples to the moon in the context of missions funded from outside the context of “NASA” that will be implemented in 2022 and 2023.
The date for the return of the samples has not yet been set, as the main objective of this step is to pave the way for a new phase of space exploration in which the private sector participates in the exploration of extraterrestrial resources under protection mechanisms. judicial.
“It is very important to create a (judicial) precedent that allows private sector agencies to extract and collect resources,” said NASA official in charge of international relations, Mike Gould.
The United States wishes to set a precedent in this regard, as there is no international consensus on extraterritorial property rights. Washington’s views on the matter contrast with those adopted by its two main rivals in the invasion of space, Russia and China.
The international treaty on space signed in 1967 lacked precision in this regard and established that “national appropriation through the declaration of sovereignty or by use or any other means” is prohibited.
The United States made it clear in the context of the “Artemis” agreements that it reserves the right to establish “safety zones” to protect its activities on an astronomical object. Artemis is the return to the moon program with two astronauts scheduled to be dispatched in 2024.
And Mike Gould emphasized that these new activities will be carried out “in line with the provisions of the Space Treaty”, noting that “it is important that the United States take leadership not only on the technological front, but also on the political level.”
[ad_2]
