Controversy over comments on Australian PM over vaccine points to coronavirus’s next nightmare


His health minister, Karen Andrews, repeated the line later, saying the government “looked after it was a mandatory vaccine.” But by Wednesday evening, Morrison was already backtracking, telling radio station 2GB that “it will not be mandatory to have the fax … there are no mandatory faxes in Australia.”

“No one will force anyone to do everything as a mandatory measure, but we will certainly encourage people to take this up,” Morrison said. “Everyone needs to understand what we are trying to achieve here.”

Morrison’s reversal came after his original remarks were seized by anti-vaccination groups in Australia and around the world, many of whom have already warned about adopted plans to force a coronavirus jab on people.

On Instagram, Larry Cook, a leading American anti-waxx campaigner and founder of Stop Mandatory Vaccines, wrote that “Australia is pushing hard for mandatory Covid vaccination.”

“Is anyone surprised? I certainly hope not. This is a PLAN demic,” he added, referring to a widely discredited video that went viral on Facebook and other platforms that made false claims about faxes.
Ben Garrison, a popular right-wing cartoonist who was invited to the White House by US President Donald Trump only to be disinvited because of his suspected anti-Semitism of his work, wrote on Twitter that Morrison’s comments “informed would make “threat of tyranny of Covid-19 vaccine. “

This is despite guarantees earlier this week from the US’s expert on infectious diseases, Dr Anthony Fauci, that a mandatory vaccine for coronavirus remains highly unlikely. “If someone rejects the vaccine in public, there is nothing they can do about it. You can not force someone to take a vaccine,” Fauci said on Tuesday.

While the remarks of Australian Prime Minister Morrison received something of an open goal for campaigns against weeks, the scandal wants to point to the broader problem of ‘hesitation of faxes’, which the World Health Organization identified last year (before the pandemic of the coronavirus) as one of the top 10 threats to public health worldwide.
“Vaccination is one of the most cost-effective ways to prevent disease – it currently prevents 2-3 million deaths per year, and a further 1.5 million could be prevented if global coverage of vaccinations improved,” states the WHO, and yet vaccinated prevalence lies on the uptick, leading to a resurgence of otherwise prevalent diseases such as measles.
According to the Lancet, anti-wax sentiment is present in 90% of countries, and although some anti-waxers have changed their minds as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, for others it has only intensified their attitude. Many groups have been campaigning for months against a potential Covid jab, even as scientists warn it is still potentially a year away.
“Covid has been a growth opportunity for anti-waxers,” warned the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), an NGO working to combat misinformation online, warned in a July report. “The extent and growth of the anti-waxx movement revealed by our research is particularly concerning as scientists estimate that 82% of the population should be immunized against Covid, whether by obtaining ‘ the disease as if by a vaccine, to be safe managed outbreaks. ”
Polling conducted by British market research firm YouGov on behalf of the CCDH found that 44% of Americans and 37% of Britons would consider not receiving coronavirus vaccine, even if it were available, a result similar to that recorded in a CNN interview in May .
Last week, Michael Caputo, an assistant secretary to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said, “We see more hesitation in getting vaccinated with the Covid vaccine than with other vaccines. We know that. This concerns us, of course.”

It should concern everyone. Without an effective coronavirus vaccine, there currently seems to be no other viable way to return to pre-pandemic normality.

There are several strong arguments in favor of mandatory vaccination, but tackling coronavirus does not necessarily require such a move. In the twentieth century, polio was brought under control thanks to a widespread understanding of the horrors of that disease, not because people were forced to take a shot.

But by using the threat or even vague suggestion of a mandate to combat a potential coronavirus vaccine, antexxers actually make such an order more likely. If vaccine intake is too low to generate herd immunity, governments should have no choice but to force vaccination, either by preventing children from attending public schools when they are not immunized, or even by instructing everyone to receive the vaccine to receive.

.