[ad_1]
The Uruguayan environment Ovation assured that the Paraguayan judge Aquino wild boaror did not go to check the VAR’s hand Sebastian Coates in the match between Uruguay and Chile Because when he consulted with those in charge of the system, it was clear what he saw on the field of play.
“According to the information that was provided to Ovation, in the audio that Chile is requesting to hear about the dialogues recorded between Aquino and the members of the VAR, it is absolutely clear that the Paraguayan international asked two specific questions and the responses received were related to their primary appreciation of the Coates play, “the quoted article says.
Always faithful to the publication “charrúa”, the Guaraní judge’s queries were “distance between the hand and the body” and “player action” (if it was voluntary or involuntary).
According to what was stated in the note, Aquino was confirmed that “the arm was close to the body at the moment of impact of the ball.” That the hand is separated from the body is a condition sine qua non it takes to collect a penalty. It was also noted that there was no voluntary action to come into contact with the ball.
“Due to these observations and following the VAR protocol, it was no longer necessary for the referee to go to review the play”, full Ovation.
