[ad_1]
The defeat of Universidad de Chile against Cobresal began to generate the first criticism of coach Rafael Dudamel, who arrived as a replacement for Hernán Caputto and with the mission of escaping relegation and qualifying for the Copa Libertadores 2021.
However, in six managed matches their numbers are not very encouraging: one win, four draws and one loss, a situation that has them in the position table in sixth place with 36 points, while in the weighted table in position 16 with an average of 1,176, only above the U. de Concepción (1,051) and Deportes Iquique (1,050). ).
For the same, Cristian Caamano conducted a hard analysis on the work of the Venezuelan in Sports in Agriculture and consulted Why did they favor Dudamel to the detriment of José Luis Sierra?
“I think the U is a bundle of nerves, I think they are not believing in Dudamel’s speech and it starts to get complicated in the weighted table. If (Hernán) Caputto was fired for Dudamel, the sports directors or those who made the final decision for the Venezuelan should be asked: What did they see in Dudamel that they didn’t see in Sierra? What arguments did the Venezuelan give you to lean towards his candidacy, over any conversation with José Luis Sierra? Seeing the campaign from one to the other, what one team plays and another, I find it difficult to believe that the U has leaned towards Dudamel”, He commented.
The U succumbed 0-2 against the mining team. (PHOTO: Agency One)
“Some footballers like Matías Rodríguez released Caputto’s hand, others like Montillo had it tied. When the Venezuelan arrives, Rodríguez becomes the captain, the starting right-back, without doing anything extraordinary. That was a clear sign from Dudamel, ”he added.
“Which player has grown up with Dudamel in six games? None. What tactical modification has Dudamel made in six games? None. It’s like Colo Colo, the same team 1-4-3-3. And now having the Colombian (Reinaldo) Lenis and that before they had to improvise Henríquez or Guerra. That is to say, It is more of the same, but with another interpreter who does not know the local level, who does not know the campus and to whom he was brought by discipline and by the draft of the fireplace”, He added.
“Today the U needs to play well, get results and it seems to me that Dudamel was not for a short-term job, but a long one. The urgency of the U is to save itself from the descent and they did not want to see it that way, I have the feeling. When it came to choosing the coach they thought: ‘let’s finish the year, we are calm and from next year we will see the real Dudamel’. But I don’t know if they are going to have a next year in the First Division ”, he added.
Regarding the match against Cobresal, he said that “it caused fear in the team. The original idea was for Jimmy Martínez to play, but he ended up leaving the team due to muscle problems. For Dudamel, Jimmy is more titular than (Walter) Montillo, with that there is a declaration of principles from the Venezuelan”.
“The U to Cobresal had controlled it well, but a mistake by Fernando de Paul changed your route and the team went into despair. The changes did not bear fruit. Montillo was not in tune with the game, jogging practically the entire commitment, I don’t know if he has physical problems, but undoubtedly this is not the Montillo before the retirement declaration. Here something happened, something broke, I don’t know if in the player, in the confidence, but this is not the Montillo that one said should continue for another year. This Montillo like this cannot continue in the U. Neither the entry of Angelo Henríquez, ends up disarming the team, three forwards enter and the 18-year-old Simón Contreras has the clearest of the second half. Cobresal spared his life, De Paul saved a pair before 2-0, but the mistake already changes the game and that failure ends up meaning points, “he said.
