[ad_1]
Contrary to official versions and empirical data approved by a group of countries that cross and fight coronavirus, In the past few days, two conspiracy theories have been known that have not received the approval of the scientific community, which ascribe the origin of the Covid-19 laboratory, monitor China and its concealment of infection, and raise suspicions about the role of the United States. To make matters worse in Argentina, the voice and personal testimony of a famous doctor from the Boca Juniors club joined in with these ideas.,
DOCUMENT THAT SAYS THAT CHINA HAS A VIRUS
This is a new documentary called “The Origin of Coronavirus in Wuhan,” which explores where the infection might have started and claims that the cause of the pandemic is unlikely to be found in the city’s animal market, which gives it its name. as the Chinese government assures.
On the Crossroads YouTube channel from The Epoch Times international newspaper, journalist Joshua Phillip followed an alternative path that leads to the Level 4 Biosafety Laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where, as an exacerbation, SARS-CoV-2 may have It was a construction or recombination of fragments various viruses to facilitate their penetration into humans, part of a study by scientist Shi Zhengli.
Philip’s central argument – that he poses as an author on Twitter “about subversive activities, rampant warfare and open espionage in China” is that Kovid 19 had to go there before leaving Wuhan market, as there is evidence Scientifically, he said, from the very beginning of the infection there were cases that were not related to this place, and various manifestations of Beijing’s alleged attempt to control the way the coronavirus is calculated.
Philip tracked the first official report, a document dated December 30, 2019 from the National Health Commission, which referred to “consecutive cases of pneumonia of unknown origin” and requested medical centers to report such cases. The next day, the Huanan market in Wuhan was mentioned, which was closed on January 1, 2020, while another government document referred to “clear evidence of human-to-human transmission.”
After disinfecting the site, what “Wuhan Filipino Coronavirus Origin” compares to “crime scene destruction”, the China Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC) Institute of Virology, announced that “33 out of 585 environmental samples from the Huahang market revealed nucleic acid content in the new coronavirus. ” Given this, the Chinese Communist Party (PCC) concluded that the virus appeared at the center of the sale of wildlife for human consumption.
A few days later, a scientific article citing a study published in The Lancet challenged this hypothesis. There, they analyzed 41 cases of Covid-19, which were treated at the Jin Yin-tan hospital, the first in the city to be treated for this disease. Sean Lin, former director of the viral division of Walter Reed Military Research Institute (WRAIR), interpreted the Crossroads documentary: “He has important information, for example, that the first patient had symptoms in December and had nothing to do with the market Huanan. ” Other subsequent works mentioned in the documentary justification coincide.
The second piece of audiovisual material, entitled “The Mysterious Genetic Sequence”, analyzed scientific details that would indicate that the virus was not naturally transmitted from one species to another or of spontaneous origin, but was synthetic. On January 11, Zhang Yong Zhen of the Shanghai Clinical Center for Public Health at Fudan University published an analysis in the journal Nature, noting that the cause of SARS in Wuhan is “closely related to the two viruses (CoVZC45 and CoVZXC21). The documentary added that these viruses were found in volatile mice in Zhoushan during an investigation conducted by the Chinese military in 2018.
Zhang’s team actually isolated and identified the entire genome sequence on January 5 and reported this to the authorities. Just in the face of the silence of the government, he published it on January 11 in the journal Nature. Soon after, Zhang’s laboratory was closed. Some researchers confirm these findings: the virus was similar to 88% with these bat strains, while it showed 79% with SARS and about 50% with the cause of respiratory syndrome in the Middle East (MERS). It was also found that the protein at the tip of the new coronavirus, which allows it to penetrate the human body, showed the same feature as SARS. “It’s hard to see a protein that is 100% identical when the virus moves from one species to another,” Lin explained at Crossroads.
In the third part of the documentary “The Discoveries of Dr. Shi Zhengli”, it was assumed that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory product that mistakenly went beyond the scope.
BRITISH MAGAZINE, WHICH WILL BE AGAINST ONE LABORATORY, BUT WITH US RESOURCES
According to the British newspaper The Mail on Sunday, the Virus Institute of Virology will become the main center for possible leakage of coronavirus due to research in the field of Chinese cave bats.
According to the publication, this laboratory would conduct these experiments at the expense of a grant of the US government in the amount of $ 3.7 million. Sequencing of the Covid-19 genome goes back to bats found in Yunnan caves, which were originally believed (and still remain the official Chinese version), that were transferred to people in the Wuhan animal market.
According to Clarin, important US academic institutions such as the University of Alabama, the University of North Texas, Harvard University, and the National Wildlife Federation are listed as partners at the Wuhan Institute.
The British newspaper version mentions that as part of research at the institute, scientists developed the coronavirus in the laboratory and introduced it to three-day-old piglets.
According to an unverified version of this publication, scientists at the institute could become infected after spraying with blood containing the virus, and then pass it on to the local community, writes The Mail on Sunday.
After mentioning several scientific evidence that contradicts this theory, the newspaper adds that the results of research funded by the United States at the Wuhan Institute have been repeatedly published in 2017 and 2018.
PHYSICIAN PHYSICIAN WHO THINKS THAT HE CONTAINED CORONAVIRUSES AND GOALS AGAINST CHINA
The famous professional of the Xeniz club Jorge Batista claimed that he had symptoms of Covid-19, but not now, but he suffered after a trip to China in the early days of December 2019.
Through an Instagram post, a historical doctor from Boca Juniors got angry with an Asian country that allegedly “hid” the disease, and told how his last days went when he returned to Argentina.
“I participated in a corpse course in Shanghai in the early days of December at a university hospital. I returned on December 12 with a fever of 37.6, a sore throat that I never remember, and a conjunctival reaction in my eyes. I associated this with stress and jet lag because it was past revolutions, “Batista began to recount.
And he added: “Most likely, he had a coronavirus !!! Linking everything that happened then !!!! I am very grateful to those who hid it, if this is true !!!!!! ”.
[ad_2]
