Toby Vega makes Leonardo Valencia bag in his superclassic notes

Once the superclassic 187 of Chilean football between Universidad de Chile and Colo Colo was over, it only remained to know the already classic notes of Marcelo Vega in the program We are all CDF Technicians.

Toby had to work to find the best five and was lapidary among the worst evaluated, with Esteban Paredes as the figure of a lackluster derby and Leonardo Valencia with a dark rating.

“I made a great effort to find something good, something positive to put together the best five,” Vega said before highlighting Paredes followed by Gonzalo Espinoza and Walter Montillo.

Esteban Paredes (6.5): “the best scorer, they depend a lot on him and if Bolados is not there, Paredes is there. What strikes me is that with 40 years they depend a lot on him, a Colo Colo that has a little, but still serves them. The great and eternal scorer who always makes a difference. The 6.5 is worth it. He is my favorite student… ”, Toby Vega reported.

Gonzalo Espinoza (6.0): “U took another breath in the second half with him. You thought it was going to last a little longer with that attack, but in the end it helps a lot because it goes up, finishes off, hits it and goes to the floor. One of the best games I have seen him in the year. Although he entered the second half, it cost him a lot when he returned, but he played well ”.

Walter Montillo (5.8): “the different player that U has, despite his age maintains a rhythm. Faces you, passes. Sometimes just because Aránguiz doesn’t appear, but the best of what we saw today ”.

Julio Barroso (5.5): “Defense improved, although they did not get much.” Juan Manuel Insaurralde (5.3): “Very good today, unlike last game he improved a lot.”

With three players from Colo Colo and two from U among the highlights, the former Chilean team midfielder gave way to the Reds and the five worst marks:

Matías Rodríguez (3.5): “It doesn’t happen, it’s not the side from before and they always come from behind. He was not in the first goal because he had stayed up. He is not the player before the pandemic where he faced and was the team’s top scorer. Today he did not play much and in the previous game neither. He did not play well and was far from what one usually sees of him.

Osvaldo González (3.0): “it is not going well at the mark and it is going out of time, of course, one thinks that he wanted to anticipate, but in the end he wanted to do the foul, he does neither of the two and ends in the goal of Colo Colo . It seems to me that the first goal is his fault ”.

Pablo Aránguiz (2.5): “He is not the one you usually see, who faces and who goes hand in hand. He’s more concerned with scoring and listening to Caputto. One can have obligations, but if you are not playing well, you have to make the decision to let go a little and play more freely, go to the middle and join Montillo. They are the games to show you, for Reinaldo Rueda to see you to go to the national team and they are the classics where you must show yourself, and today he did very badly ”.

Nicolás Blandi (2.0): “One thinks that it is a reinforcement and a reinforcement should be a starter. He enters the second half and does not appear much. When he has a play he only misses a wonderful pass from Matías Fernández. It was easier to throw it inside than outside next to the arch. For what it cost and the expectation it generated, that goal cannot be missed ”.

Leonardo Valencia (1.5): “he is not here to play, he does not appear, he does not take the ball, he does not make decisions, he does not go looking for the ball, he does not make his teammates play. We all understand that it is not 10, but that Gualberto Jara looks for a position for him to develop his game. He is not a creator and is lost. He is not in a good football moment or emotionally. Clearly the one who does things is Paredes when he hits it from Valencia ”.