[ad_1]
The defense of Eliazar Parra Santibáñez, one of those involved in the “New Robbery of the Century” and the only one who could not be apprehended by the police launched a judicial maneuver, by presenting an appeal for protection in which asks for explanations of why detectives went to look for him at his house.
The legal action was filed with the Santiago Court of Appeals by the fugitive’s lawyer, Mariano Geoffroy Castro, precisely against the PDI and the Public Ministry, in which he asked to clarify what the investigation against Parra and He also denounces police harassment.
As explained in a brief three-page document, the person involved in the theft of $ 13 billion occurred on March 9 at the Santiago airport, he explained to the professional that officials from the Investigative Police arrived at his home in the Peñalolén district in search of him.
Although they did not find him, civilian staff questioned his neighbors, displaying photos of him, and then asking for his whereabouts.
“This defense tried to find out what the investigation carried out against my client is about, and could not find any cause,” it is detailed in the brief.
In the lawyer’s opinion, what happened violates constitutional guarantees such as the inviolability of the home and the right to due process, in addition to other rights contained in the Constitution that establish the right of every person to reside and stay anywhere in the Republic; move from one place to another; and enter and leave their territory.
“Police harassment also constitutes an infringement of the guarantee of the personal freedom of my client,” the complaint states, before adding that “his person has not been intimidated. no court order that justifies this action, which makes the actions of these State agents even more suspicious ”.
According to La Tercera, the appeal was declared inadmissible by the capital appeals court, but the appeal was accepted by the Supreme Court, an instance that forced the prosecution of the case to continue and officiate at the Public Ministry and the PDI to clarify the reasons. of the proceedings.
[ad_2]
