[ad_1]
The Children’s Ombudsman, Patricia Muñoz, filed an appeal for protection at the Santiago Court of Appeals, due to the agreement signed in February between Sename and the National Intelligence Agency (ANI), which would violate various constitutional rights of children. and adolescents, for example, the right to privacy.
This agreement was rejected by various actors linked to childhood, because “Would stigmatize and criminalize” children and adolescents who should be protected by the National Service for Minors.
Patricia Muñoz maintained that both organizations, the Sename and the ANI, acted illegally and arbitrarily, exceeding the powers that both organizations have.
“We have already deducted an appeal before the Court of Appeals for the manifest illegality and arbitrariness in the behavior of both institutions that without any protection of what the protection of human rights of children and adolescents implies (…) have signed this agreement that far exceeds their legal powers ”Patricia Muñoz said.
NHRI officiated at Interior
The director of the NHRI, Sergio Micco, He pointed out that they officiated at the Ministry of the Interior and Public Security to explain this agreement, which -according to the agency- violates constitutional rights.
“We are asking ourselves, of course, what a child’s superior good has to do with a national intelligence agency,” Micco said.
FA went to the Comptroller
Representatives of the Broad Front entered a request to the Office of the Comptroller General of the Republic, to review the legality of the agreement between the two organizations.
This was explained by the president of the Defense commission of the Chamber of Deputies, Jorge Brito (RD).
“We believe that this agreement is illegal and unconstitutional,” said Brito.
Meanwhile, the Council for Transparency assured that this agreement does not comply with the constitutional guarantee of data protection in children and adolescents.
This was explained by the president of the CPLT, Jorge Jaraquemada.
“If we also consider the circumstance that they are minors who are especially vulnerable. It is not the role of the Council to judge the reasons for signing this agreement, however, we can point out that does not comply with the constitutional guarantee of data protection for children and adolescents ”Jaraquemada highlighted.
Finally, the ex-director of Sename, Francisco Estrada, maintained that the ANI is there to advise the Presidency of the Republic, and that there is no record in the Sename folders that serves the intelligence agency.
[ad_2]
