Red average: Pollo Veliz gives his notes for Colo Colo’s performance in the Superclásico | Dale Albo



[ad_1]

Colo Colo did not pass the Superclásico test and drew 1-1 with Universidad de Chile at the National Stadium, in a match where the Cacique depended on the effectiveness of Esteban Efraín Paredes, who again scored in a classic.

Sports commentators, some journalists and former soccer players, have criticized the actions of Gualberto Jara’s team and one of them was Pollo Veliz, who in conversation with Redgol put a note on the entire squad.

Gabriel Suazo, Esteban Paredes, Pablo Mouche, Julio Barroso, Brayan Cortés and Matías Fernández saved with the blue for the former Colo Colo player.




Brayan Cortés (5.0): He had no responsibility for Gonzalo Espinoza’s goal, he had nothing to do, he didn’t have much work either.

Julio Barroso (4.0): El Cacique played a defensive game where he did not gravitate, nor did the passing game, which is one of his characteristics, without leadership against an amorphous team.

Gabriel Suazo (4.0): Similar to Opazo, every day more inconsequential.

Pablo Mouche (5.0): He dares and it seems to me an offensive contribution.

Esteban Paredes (4.5): Only the goal and it is a distinction, for one goal and 45 minutes he cannot be the figure of the poorest classic of the decade.

Matías Fernández (5.0): What little he played, he showed off. He put a pass goal to Blandi that could be the winning goal.

Colo Colo vs University of Chile

The red notes were more and this was detailed by Pollo Veliz.

Óscar Opazo (3.0): He stopped being the offensive agent that Colo Colo had a long time ago

Juan Insaurralde (3.0): No threat in the air like Barroso, although he defended very well.

César Fuentes (3.0): To this day I wonder, what did they bring him to Colo Colo?

Carlos Carmona (3.0): Like Fuentes, he does not prevail at all.

Leonardo Valencia (3.0): Trotter, without ideas, without drive, without anything. They changed it for something.

Marcos Bolados (3.0): He succumbed to the mark, he did not gravitate in skill or speed.

Felipe Campos (3.0): He came in to defend the tie and nothing else.

Nicolás Blandi (3.0): He had the winning goal and lost it, it is still a disappointment.

Gualberto Jara (3.0): He has not shown anything and was the protagonist of the poorest classic that has been seen in decades.

Only if you lose the classic

Do not miss the last minute news!

Subscribe to our news

[ad_2]