[ad_1]
The North Central Prosecutor’s Office opened a investigation against the adolescent pushed by a policeman from the Pío Nono bridge due to possible public disorders, cause that leads the pursuer Patricio Cooper.
The version of the facts of the command of the uniformed police and the defense of the accused of the incident, Sebastián Zamora – who point out that the cash sought to arrest the minor – is what motivated this investigation, as published The Third PM.
However, now the case is divided into two: the investigation for attempted homicide and possible obstruction of the investigation against Zamora, carried out by the High Complexity Prosecutor’s Office; and this new cause, which inquires actions prior to the fall of the minor, for which Patricio Cooper dispatched an order to investigate the Criminal Investigation Brigade (Bicrim) of Santiago de la PDI.
Detectives must now check all cameras in the area -for which they will request audiovisual records kept in the Sala Prat of the Municipality of Santiago and in the Municipality of Providencia-, analyzing the 30 minutes prior to the push, to try to locate the adolescent through their clothing.
While, Carabineros have said they have images of the affected person throwing stones at their police cars, placing him because he was wearing a diver from the Universidad de Chile club and a hood of various colors.
“There is no precedent that allows trying to kill a subject”
From the defense of the minor, the lawyer Fernando Monsalve indicated that neither he nor his family were aware of the prosecutor Cooper’s investigation, adding that the background information the uniformed police would have “they do not change the fact under investigation at all, and if they are indeed investigating it, it will be necessary to see it in its minute and defend it as in any case. “
“Regardless of whether he is actually going to be investigated for public disorders or not, the action of the police officer is clear and there is no liability exception or antecedent that allows attempting to kill a subject, because eventually he was committing public disorder or some other crime “, remarked the jurist.
While “We Importan”, a group that provides legal assistance to accused officials in cases of public order, argued that “this new case is undoubtedly a contribution that complements the investigation (for the attempted homicide), gives context, allows understanding of In a better way, what happened, to have the complete movie. It is important not only to clarify the accident at the Pio Nono Bridge, but also everything that happened that day. “
