[ad_1]
Asked about the reason behind the refusal to remove the general director of the Carabineros, Mario Rozas, the Minister of the Interior said this morning on television that whoever knows him “knows that I am not going to do it (…) that is a blackmail and I am not in politics to bear blackmail, there are many today in the country who are blackmailed, who are threatened and may succumb, at least I am not going to do it. “
The response of the Secretary of State provoked the reaction of the promoters of the accusation against Minister Pérez, which was reactivated after the events that occurred on October 2 at the Pío Nono bridge.
The PS deputy, Jaime Naranjo, said, according to the Emol slogan, that he would have expected that in said interview “rather than sketch mere disqualifying epithets about the constitutional accusation, he would have better expected a self-criticism about his role, about his management, as well as the role that he has fulfilled the institution of Carabineros, but zero self-criticism. “
The PPD deputy, Rodrigo González, added that “the only blackmailer here is Minister Pérez, he has been unable to protect public order, to prevent violence in Chile, to safeguard human rights and people’s lives, life especially of those who are demonstrating. “
The deputy Gabriel Ascencio (DC), stated, in the same tone, that “here there is no blackmail of any nature, what happens is that at this point, as we are, in reality today it is not only necessary that he leave Rozas “.
The deputy Alejandra Sepúlveda (FRVS), described as “unpresentable” the statement of Minister Pérez, and pointed out that what was blackmail “was this stoppage of the truckers that finally ends with an agreement in La Moneda.” “Those of us who signed the constitutional accusation have never made the withdrawal of General Rozas contingent, they are absolutely different things and we have determined from the first day that they are not binding and that it has nothing to do from a procedural point of view and how the prosecution is going to continue. constitutional accusation, “said the parliamentarian to the electronic medium.
[ad_2]
