[ad_1]
Brazil took the three points from Nacional de Lima after defeating Peru 2-4. But beyond the result, Neymar’s triplet and the defensive errors of the local team, the eyes are all taken by Julio Bascuñán.
The Chilean referee was the main protagonist of tonight’s match, but not for a good job. The Peruvian press was not at all happy with the performance of the national whistle and he left with everything accusing a “robbery”.
The media of the neighboring country could not bear the frustration of the defeat and gave hard to Bascuñán for the two penalties in favor of Brazil, the expulsion of Carlos Zambrano and the non-revision of the VAR in the fouls against Neymar.
This is how he titled El Bocón to give Bascuñán after his controversial match.
“Bascuñán steals the show at the Nacional“They started at El Bocón, and then hit the Chilean hard.”The one who STOLE the whole show was the Chilean referee Julio Bascuñán. And it is that the judge of the game did not review any play of Brazil in the VAR, however, he did the opposite with the Bicolor. In the same way he did it with cards, plays, doubts and more“they added.
The Libero was not far behind either and classified as “lousy arbitration“what was done by the national whistle. The same line that La República followed, where they lowered a change and branded it as”controversial“.
The Libero also hit Bascuñán after the match.
The Republic was softer, but made it clear that it did not like Bascuñán’s arbitration.
Bascuñán’s interventions
Bascuñán had several interventions throughout the match, but it was in the goals of Brazil that the Peruvian claims were raised the most.
In the first two goals The referee listened to the advice of Piero Maza, who was in charge of the VAR, where there was nothing outside the regulation, but it was the third goal that raised all the controversy.
Brazil’s 1-1 draw was reviewed by the VAR and it was determined that there was no advance position prior to Neymar’s penalty.
The 2-2 equality was also revised in the VAR, making it clear that it did not exist offside.
And it is that Neymar fell in the area after a counterattack, but the television cameras showed more of a pool than anything else. This weighed on the judge, who decided not to review anything and go ahead with the game.
It was in Neymar’s penalty that meant the 2-3 that the big one was armed, since the cameras did not make it clear if it was a penalty or not. But the judge was facing the play.
Beyond everything that can be said in the neighboring country, the truth is that Conmebol again scores a tremendous refereeing problem in only two qualifying dates. Will there be penalties? If there was silence with what happened in Uruguay, it seems difficult.
