[ad_1]
During the afternoon of this Friday, after the discovery of the body of Tomás Bravo and the arrest of his great-uncle, several discussions have come to the fore, such as the replacement of the death penalty, the one that was approached by the presidential candidate Mario Desbordes (RN).
Desbordes declared that what would happen to him if he had a similar situation with one of his children would be to kill the culprit of the act, according to what he told in The afternoon of Hola Chile on La Red.
In this regard, overflows explained that “When legislating one cannot legislate with specific cases, and less with the case right here. If he were my son, what is born to me is to do justice by my hands ”.
“If that happened to my daughter, the truth is that I give myself over to it, I personally killed him and the truth is that I have no doubt that that would probably be a reaction and they would have to lock me up so I wouldn’t do it “, Held.
He then explained that “it is not legislated for particular cases, one cannot legislate from your personal experience, it is legislated with a global or general vision.
“Being imprisoned in a jail is tremendous, it is terrible. The truth is that at first, when I got to work at Colina 1 and 2 – I worked inside the jail as head of the labor area of Colina 1 and 2 of the prison complex – one says ‘heck, this rooster has to be killed’, but when one begins to know the prison from the inside, and especially prisons like ours, the ones that are overcrowded (…), being in prison for 10, 20 years is an extraordinarily harsh, strong sanction “, he indicated.
Asked again about whether he would abolish the death penalty, he replied that “no, I am against the death penalty. In no case… (…), we transform ourselves into beasts when we ourselves kill a person ”.
Later, and after the controversy that these statements generated, Desbordes clarified: “The question is whether the death penalty would be reinstated. What I explain (…) is that this is born to a father, but that it should not be legislated from that, that it is not legislated for particular cases with the heart, but with reason, and that although (it may be) unpopular, it would not replace the death penalty “.
[ad_2]
