Jadue insists that there is a political operation against the CP and defends “independence” from the party



[ad_1]

The mayor of Recoleta and presidential candidate of the Communist Party, Daniel Jadue (PC), declared today to agree with the decision of his community, which refused to establish a unitary list with a view to the election of conventional constituents of the next 11 of April.

Insisting that there is a “political operation” against his party, which is continually accused of being the culprit of the disagreements in the center-left, he stated that “everyone has put the responsibility on the PC”, in a scenario where Democracy Cristiana has also been absent.

“The first letter for the unitary list I signed, but when I realized that an operation against the PC, I said better not to participate in this,” said Jadue in an interview with the Central Table of Channel 13. And he added that “now we they want to force those who signed the agreement of November 15 to go, on a list because or if not, according to them, we lose the Constitution. Well, they made a bad agreement, take responsibility and don’t blame anyone. “

The current building chief, who assured that despite his good results in the polls he is still focused on re-election in the mayor’s office of the capital commune, also stated that in his opinion, the opposition wins more in the face of the election of constituents by going separate, because there is “greater representativeness”.

“Do you think that in a list where the neoliberal social democrats and the anti-neoliberals go, more votes are obtained than each one goes to look for their respective votes? I think that many more are obtained by going two,” he said, adding that “it is the same perception that the DC has and for the first time we agree. The party that won the most primaries did not go up to that, and on the side here, the party that won the most primaries and that the RM won did not go up either “, he warned, specifying that he could not make alliances in the face of divergences that he described as basic.

“With these common minimums I cannot agree, they do not represent at all what the citizenship has demanded, what they have put on the table. So, if we are going to risk going on a single list with people who do not want the Constitution who want the people, I prefer to go on a separate list with an anti-neoliberal bloc, “he said.



[ad_2]