[ad_1]
Several months have passed since the departure of Patricia maldonado of Mega, which occurred after having spent 17 years linked to the channel. The situation was discussed in the panel of the program I Late Prime.
Who started the debate was Andrés Caniulef, who was in favor of Maldonado’s departure from the morning Mucho Gusto, to which she had been linked in the last time.
“It was a wise decision on the part of the channel, I think his figure generates a lot of resentment and I think that finally the program wanted to shield itself,” said the journalist.
“We all know that 2020 has been a very complex year for the media and any symptom of a different idea, or in this case a very extreme idea like Paty Maldonado’s, unfortunately did not come to fruition and ended up contaminating not only the program , if not the entire team, “he added.
The situation was also analyzed by Pamela Diaz, who is close to Maldonado. The “Fiera” indicated that it did not agree with the decision they had made in Mega.
“I really feel that it was unfair, someone who was 18 or 19 years in the Pleasure, in fact it was a pioneer when the Pleasure… I never saw Paty involved with something that was negative for the program ”, Indian.
After that came another comment from Caniulef: “(Patricia) unfortunately generates a lot of resentment, but indeed the channel always knew who Patricia Maldonado was and during the 18 years that she was working with them, it basically served to increase the rating.”
Finally, Díaz indicated that the opinionologist has not had more contact with her former channel partners.
“For 19 years we have known who Paty Maldonado is and to whom she is devoted. Paty was not spoken to, I went to see her 6 or 7 months ago, I went to see her at her house, and I asked him ‘who from the channel called you?’, ‘nobody’ “, concluded.
[ad_2]
