“It was too much”: opposition criticizes Foreign Ministry report to embassies | National



[ad_1]

After the report that the Chancellor, Andrés Allamand, released to different embassies on the official version of the Government regarding the social outbreak and the Plebiscite was released, the opposition’s criticism did not wait.

The 10-page document indicates that what happened on October 18, 2019 “mixed two elements: unusual and unknown violence, whose maximum expression was the destruction of several stations and cars of the Santiago Metro and peaceful protests, which in some cases they were massive ”.

In addition, it highlights the agreement that different political parties reached, with the exception of the Communist Party, which gave rise to the Plebiscite that will decide whether a new Constitution will be drawn up, according to the text “At the request” of President Sebastián Piñera.

The former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ricardo Lagos, Ignacio Walker, said that the report involves a government policy rather than a State policy and that, therefore, “it was too much.”

“It is a very partial document, very biased,” he questioned.


From the Socialist Party, Senator Juan Pablo Letelier said during the Constitution Commission that the report shows “the divorce” that the Executive has with “what is happening in our society and the reasons why we are experiencing the social explosion.”

Official defense

In Chile Vamos, the RN deputy, Tomás Fuentes, also a member of the instance, supported Foreign Minister Andrés Allamand and stressed that social conflicts be resolved through institutional means.

“What it has done is to reposition Chile in the international arena,” he said.

A position shared by his co-religionist, Deputy Catalina Del Real, who said she hoped to maintain “normality” achieved in the country.

“We managed to overcome and reach an agreement,” he valued.

According to the text released to the embassies on the demonstrations during the social outbreak, it indicates that “there is no doubt that factors such as poor income distribution, low pensions and deficiencies in the public health system influenced this phenomenon.”



[ad_2]