[ad_1]
Did you find a bug?
let us know
Ernesto Ryan in Agence France Presse
Follow the Bio Bio Sports Fanpage
The scandalous arbitration, by Eber Aquino, that harmed The Red before Uruguay in Montevideo it was the big theme at the beginning of the qualifiers.
There have been multiple reactions that have been generated around the issue, starting with the criticism of the Paraguayan’s performance and the unknown why the very clear hand of Coates in the area did not go to review the VAR.
For now the president of the ANFP, Pablo Milad, He asked Conmebol for the audios and videos of the conversation between the referee and the VAR, which will arrive next week. However, there is already a leak.
The newspaper El País of Uruguay had access to the dialogue and revealed part of the alleged talk between the two parties. Aquino would have asked two key questions to decide not to collect the Uruguayan player’s hand.
“The Paraguayan asked two specific questions and the responses received were related to his primary appreciation of Coates’ play,” they noted.
Aquino asked the following: ‘How far is the hand from the body?’ Y ‘What is the player’s action’ (voluntary or involuntary) ”, they revealed.
The VAR’s response was as follows: “It was confirmed that the arm was close to the body at the moment of impact of the ball. That the hand is separated from the body is a sine qua non (essential for something to happen) that is needed to take a penalty. It was also pointed out that there was no voluntary action to come into contact with the ball ”.
“Due to these observations and following the VAR protocol, it was no longer necessary for the referee to go to review the play ” closed.
[ad_2]
