[ad_1]
After the pale equality of Colo Colo and Universidad de Chile in the 187th edition of the Chilean soccer Superclásico, Juan Cristóbal Guarello made a detailed analysis of the Cacique’s main shortcomings.
The commentator pointed out that what Gualberto Jara raises, which he classified as a team, is very predictable. “slow”. that depended on some sparks from Pablo Mouche, one of the best of the game.
“Universidad de Chile had the pressure and it showed it in the first half. Insecure, a blurred team, well marked Montillo by Fuentes and that took away elaboration, Rodríguez who goes and does not return and Colo Colo took advantage of a good half hour from Mouche. There the goal was generated and some more, not many. Colo Colo held up well in the background, a couple of war shivers that were not even goals. On the contrary, Colo Colo apart from the goal and another hot flash, a shiver from Valencia. But he put up with it, Colo Colo did it slow, he played slow deliberately, he tried to get the rhythm of Universidad de Chile “, started.
He added that from Espinoza’s goal, the U looked better on the court. “Football has details and in the first play of the second half he is headed three times in the area and Cortés is then off-foot without reaction. The U was better there, but there is a difference between dominating, having control of the game, not letting the rival go out to generate scoring chances. And there was no save until Larrivey’s heads up. Beausejour was free to move forward, Fuentes wasted on the Montillo brand without leaving it completely, but the U controlled “, he pointed out.
Colo Colo and the U matched in a lackluster match.
He highlighted the contribution of Matías Fernández in his entrance to the Ñuñoa lawn: “At least it generated a couple of occasions, which is already a lot, both for Blandi and both very poorly defined by Blandi. Especially the first, which was a goal. It was missing that they tied the ball to her with a string and that she headed it. ‘Do it’ and threw it over the crossbar. Of course, after Matías Fernández tried to put in a play from 2006, he lost it and Larrivey thinks too much for Cortés to win. “.
“From there the game became increasingly blurred. When there are spaces, you have to take advantage of them with speed and none had it. Except for the dewatering of Cortés, none of them had a small overhang, a shot that required the archers. Just shivers “, he complemented.
However, he warns that a very complicated outlook is coming for the Cacique in the next matches, since his problems are even deeper. “In Colo Colo the question is where is the exit for this team, plan B, what else can it do?”, he began his explanation.
“It depends on the overflow of Bolados, Mouche and that Paredes is fine. But he has no more. It is a predictable team. Opazo arrives very little, Suazo does not arrive, today he played with two midfielders for the bustle such as Fuentes and Carmona. Valencia evidently has his head in something else, he is not an unbalancing player, it seems that he is going, but nothing; It seems that it is going to finish and does not finish. The three or four balls of Matías Fernández who seem to be not even for 45 minutes were better than that permanent hint of Valencia that is nothing. It’s like they are electrocuting him “, he pointed.
Finally, he ruled that this has one “One of the worst classics I’ve seen, although Sierra’s with Beccacece is insurmountable because of the terror they both had to lose, the difference is that there were audiences and they screwed up. Today, luckily for the two coaches, there were no people. No one could have been satisfied with what happened “.
Only if you lose the classic
