The Santiago Court of Appeals confirmed the ruling that rejected the lawsuit brought against the Treasury for allegedly not providing educational services to a cadet who graduated from the Aviation School in 2017 due to poor academic performance.

The 2nd Chamber of the appeal court ruled out errors of fact and law in the contested sentence, the first instance ruling issued by the 22nd Civil Court of Santiago, which rejected the demand for termination of the contract and compensation for attempted damages.

“That the alleged errors of fact and law that constitute the allegations that are wielded in support of the challenge of the plaintiff and the merit of the documents accompanied in this instance fail to distort, in the opinion of these judges, the grounds taken into consideration by the sentenced to quo to resolve, substantively, in the way he did, which is why the petition that is submitted to the consideration of this Court for said intervener will be ultimately dismissed “, sustains the ruling.

The resolution adds: “That the claim raised in the adhesion to the appeal made by the Treasury, will also be rejected, because in the opinion of these judges, beyond the judicial result of the sub lite action, the plausibles had plausible motives to litigate” .

“Due to these considerations, legal norms cited and also taking into account the provisions of articles 186 and following of the Code of Civil Procedure, the final judgment appealed dated December 6, two thousand and eighteen, pronounced by the Twenty-Second Civil Court of Santiago, is confirmed. ”.