[ad_1]
The demolition of a 16-story building This is what the mayor of Recoleta, Daniel Jadue, demands after the Supreme Court rejected an appeal for protection filed by a real estate agency so that the apartments that have been ready since 2012. Neighbors ask, at once, to be able to inhabit the properties that bought.
“It is decreed and affirms the decree of demolition“, Said on the one hand Jadue, while on the other the journalist Jorge Díaz, buyer of an apartment, assures that he is lying.
That’s how controversial everything is between Municipality of Recoleta, the company Desarrollo Inmobiliario Bellavista SA and the neighbors of this building.
From the outside, in front of the construction, it is the closest that the renowned former newscaster has been to the apartment he owns on the 14th floor, and that, according to the mayor of the commune, has a future, literally, devastating for those who bought apartments in the place.
“We are satisfied that justice has finally made the law reign and that this has to be done again, but as the rules dictate, “added the mayor of Recoleta.
Read also: Sichel hopes to have support that goes “from Freedom and Development to people from the world of DC”
In other words, demolish this building that, almost 9 years ago since it is ready to be inhabited. Or, rather, almost ready, because the municipal reception that Recoleta refuse to grant is missing.
The reason? Its 16 floors far exceed the 9 maximums established in the regulatory plan. This Wednesday, a new pronouncement of the justice was known about this controversy: the Supreme Court ratified what was resolved in 2020, rejecting the protection appeal filed by the owners that sought to force this building to be received by the municipality.
“The real estate is going to have to demolishWe hope that it complies with the ruling and if it is not going to be the municipality that, in a prudent time, will take the actions to make this happen, ”added Jadue.
For his part, Christian Espejo, the real estate attorney, points out that what was said by the highest court in the country would not be such, but only maintains that will not rule in view of another claim for invalidity still pending.
Read also: Pdte. Association of Magistrates after conviction of “Cisarro”: “This case is the defeat of the system”
“Mayor Jadue misrepresents again, he misses the truth again, as it has done since day one, “said the attorney for Desarrollo Inmobiliario Bellavista.
The Supreme Court ruling ensures that there is no action they can take, taking into account this pending, currently in process, and therefore the case is not finished. Of course that generated different readings between the real estate and the municipality. Mayor Jadue demands the demolition of the building, does the ruling point to that?
The lawyer and academic Rebeca Zamora assures that a ruling in this regard is still pending. “The real estate company cannot be considered the winner either. In the previous ruling, what the court said was that the municipality has to rule on the request for receipt, but in no case does it mean that you have to accept it“.
Of course, the previous ruling left everything in the hands of the municipality, which flatly refuses to accept the building. Y in the middle of this dispute are the owners, that for 9 years they cannot inhabit the apartments they bought.
[ad_2]
