[ad_1]
The Supreme Court of the United States inflicted a new slight on President Donald Trump on Friday by rejecting an appeal presented by the Texas authorities that was aimed at reversing his defeat in the November presidential elections.
Its nine members, including three appointed by the Republican president, concluded that Texas had no right to interfere in the organization of elections in other states.
Three days before the Electoral College meets to formally designate the winner of the elections, the president still refuses to acknowledge his defeat against Democrat Joe Biden and assures that the election was “stolen.”
For lack of tangible evidence to support his allegations of “massive fraud,” the fifty or more complaints filed by his allies across the United States have been dismissed by the courts or withdrawn.
Following these failures, and a first setback to the Supreme Court, Texas authorities filed an appeal Tuesday that appeared to be a last-minute operation by Trump supporters.
They demanded the annulment of the results in four key states won by Biden (Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin) on the grounds that, according to them, local authorities had violated electoral laws by extending the use of vote by mail.
Trump had described the case as “very strong” and intervened in a personal capacity in the process.
More than 120 Republican elected congressmen formally associated with the claim, much as legal experts criticized it.
“It is a press release disguised as a complaint,” estimated Professor Rick Hasen on his Election Blog site.
“We have a new nominee for the ‘craziest electoral complaint’ category,” added Texas colleague Steve Vladeck on Twitter.
For the first time in its history, the very serious Scotusblog, which covers news from the Supreme Court, called on its justices to “crush” the Texas complaint.
“This is not a serious complaint or a legitimate position,” said its co-founder Tim Goldstein.
Trump had lobbied the justices. “They must show great courage and great wisdom. Save America, ”he tweeted on Friday.
The president, who radically changed the members of the Supreme Court, declared the day after the vote that he would resort to it.
You were probably expecting a reissue of the 2000 scenario, when the Supreme Court disrupted the counting of votes in the state of Florida, allowing George W. Bush to win the election.
[ad_2]
