[ad_1]
During his speech at the Labor Commission of the Chamber of Deputies and Deputies, the Minister of Labor and Social Security, Maria Jose Zaldivar, referred to the indication that would allow the forced withdrawal of pension funds to parents who owe their alimony.
In her discussion, the Secretary of State stated that pension debt in itself “is a delicate issue and that it denotes a reality that we are experiencing as a country that is very serious,” and pointed to the analysis of the data provided by Deputy Mirosevic , indication driver.
As quoted by the parliamentarian, “Nearly 70 thousand fathers or mothers had not been able to receive the alimony resources owed” in the first withdrawal of 10%, since the debtors would not have requested their money, preventing this retention from taking place.
Read also: Hoffmann and withdrawal of 10%: “I would have liked that the strength of the project had been in returning those resources”
However, as Zaldívar explained, “there is another way of looking at this data and it is that the 80% of the alimony pensions notified by the Judicial Power as not paid, were likely to be withheld. 80% of the fathers or mothers who had or owed alimony, did withdraw ”, he indicated.
Faced with this last piece of information, the Labor Minister emphasized that “it cannot be that children in our country are only receiving the resources that correspond to them by virtue of food pensions when there is an extraordinary retirement.”
However, the secretary of state raised an argument that caused controversy on social networks. And it is that it ensured that those parents who have alimony debts, through forced withdrawal “They are not going to take charge of these alimony pensions, but in the future it will be the whole of society that will have to finance it”.
Read also: Citizen Pulse Survey: 67.8% prefer the 10% project presented by the opposition
“Establishing that the mechanism through which I am going to pay for children’s meals in Chile will be through the recovery of the resources that in the future should be used to finance the pensions of these parents, will imply that all the rest of society will finance these alimony pensions, because those future parents will be beneficiaries of the solidarity pillarZaldívar explained.
For this reason, the Minister of Labor stated that “What corresponds is to look for mechanisms to be able to ensure the payment of these meals month by month”.
[ad_2]
