Prosecutor evaluates filing an appeal to reverse the freedom of 7 accused for threats to prosecutor Chong | National



[ad_1]

Fiscal Francisco Jacir | Video capture



visits

The Central North regional prosecutor, Francisco Jacir, reported that they are evaluating filing an appeal to reverse the decision of the 7th Guarantee Court of Santiago that only one of the eight formalized for threats against the High Complexity persecutor, Ximena Chong.

Judge Tatiana Escobar accepted the request of the Public Ministry only against Pablo Elías Martínez Castro, who had a UZI at home, weapon prohibited in the country.

For the rest of those involved, a monthly signature was established and a prohibition against approaching the victim and his family.

Gabriel Jara Vivanco, Daniel Goldberger Garcés, Solange Aravena Méndez, Paula Narváez Orrego, Osvaldo Urcola Díaz-Valdés, Benjamín Morelos and Fernando Hasler Martínez were arrested for leaving at the prosecutor’s home a letter with threats.

The foregoing occurs after the resolution left in preventive prison of the Carabineros Sebastián Zamora, accused of causing the fall of a minor from the Pío Nono Bridge to the bed of the Mapocho River.

Before the resolution, the prosecutor Jacir affirmed that “it leaves us in a satisfied part, since, despite the various questions made by the defense, they were not accepted, and the position of the Public Ministry regarding the claim of the facts and the participation of the accused ”.

Submit an appeal

Despite this, he declared that he did not share the precautionary measure that was filed and because of that “Study a resource” and the decision to attend the Court of Appeals or not.

Regarding Martínez, who did remain in prison, he explained that in addition to the investigation into the threats to the prosecutor, he was formalized for other crimes: the possession of military weapons and the carrying of the ammunition associated with that weapon.

This article describes an ongoing legal process

There is a possibility that the charges will be dismissed at the end of the investigation, therefore The accused (s) should NOT be considered guilty until Justice dictates sentence against him.
(Article 04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure)



[ad_2]