[ad_1]
Starting at 10:30 am on Tuesday, the Senate Constitution Committee resumed the debate on the constitutional reform that allows the second withdrawal of 10% of the AFPs, an issue that once again has the Government in check.
The president of the instance, Alfonso de Urresti (PS) pointed out that “it is key that the Senate pronounce itself to turn it into law and dispatch this bill as soon as possible” that has already been overwhelmingly approved in the Chamber of Deputies.
The procedure in the commission is prior to the project reaching the Chamber, where it is taken for granted that it will have the necessary votes for its approval. In fact, yesterday four senators from Chile Vamos – Manuel José Ossandón (RN), José Durana (UDI), Juan Castro (RN) and David Sandoval (UDI) – agreed with the initiative, but at the same time called on the Government to present a project that regulates these constitutional reforms that allow withdrawals of funds. In the same line of approval is another official senator, Iván Moreira.
In fact, The Mercury indicates that the Government would effectively present its own retirement project, targeting unemployed persons or those whose income has been reduced by at least 30% and that the amounts extracted are subject to tax for certain income brackets.
This possibility is viewed with suspicion in the opposition. In fact, Senator De Urresti stated this morning in Mega his surprise that the ministers who were in the Constitution Committee on Friday have not reported on the initiative, and insisted that the withdrawal should be universal, without taxes or fine print.
The government’s strategy
Another strategy of the Government on this issue has been to try to link the processing of the withdrawal of funds with the discussion of the pension reform that is trapped in the Senate. In fact, Finance Minister Ignacio Briones has taken steps to play that card. “We are talking, it is always good to talk, dialogue is what allows the country to advance (…) We are always looking for the best relations with the opposition or part of it that is constructive, because the country needs it,” he said yesterday , as reported Third.
It is an alternative to which even the president of the Confederation of Production and Commerce, Juan Sutil, gave his approval. “We have a pension reform underway, 15 years ago we have been talking … It seems to me that these decisions that the Chamber and Congress are taking, where a first withdrawal has already been approved, contravene the purpose of future retirements,” she said. tomorrow the helmsman of the business community, in an interview with Radio Universe.
In Sutil’s opinion, the way is to “avoid the second withdrawal with approval and negotiation that allows for a pension reform as soon as possible. The Government has the obligation to do it and the legislative sector also “
However, the option is frowned upon by the opposition. “They are two different discussions. In the 10% retirement, the Government has problems with its own (legislators) The issue of pensions is an issue where there is a problem between the Government and the opposition. So dealing with these two issues together is a mistake, “said Socialist Senator Juan Pablo Letelier, president of the Labor Commission, to the same station this morning.
The idea of TC
Another path considered by La Moneda would be to insist on resorting to the Constitutional Court, but not by appealing to the argument of the 2/3 quorum – which was struck down in the massive vote of the House – but on the grounds that the Constitution cannot be changed by via transitory norms without modifying the text of the Magna Carta or by appealing to the exclusive power of the President of the Republic of legislative initiative in matters of fiscal expenditure and in matters of social security.
But in the opposition they reject this argument. In the opinion of Matías Walker, president of the Chamber’s Constitution Commission, “the right to social security can be regulated in its temporary exercise through a transitory provision. No one here has had their funds taken from them. “
In any case, the CT route appears as an unviable strategy. “I have the impression that it is not going to do it,” said Walker in Radio Pattern.
[ad_2]
