Lawsuit extended in Pío Nono case: they ask to investigate the carabineros cover-up after video dialogues | National



[ad_1]

Ailén Díaz | UNO Agency



visits

An extension of the complaint of the young man’s lawyer was presented before the Seventh Guarantee Court of Santiago AAA, in the framework of the attempted murder case against the former Sebastian Zamora.

In the judicial action it is requested to investigate obstruction of investigation Y concealment to colleagues from Zamora who were with him on October 2, when the events occurred in the Pío Nono bridge.

Everything is born after yesterday BioBioChile publish a report made by the Investigative Police on the videos recorded by a camera that Zamora was carrying on the day of the operation.

In the images you can hear uniformed men tell him what version should i give of the facts.

“Now, raise your head, now look at me … little man pa ‘la gue … are we? Look at me, what happened … you went to catch a gee … who was throwing stones, right? When you grabbed it, the gue… you dropped it, that happened to you, right? That happened to you, that happened to you ”.

He was also told that “I was neither the first nor the last to be questioned by the war… But if you died with your version, nothing will happen to you, we’re? Nobody can make you change your gueá, nobody, because you never had the intention of throwing it away or any gue … (…) Zamora, he jumped … I was with you, I was running next to you, I did not leave you alone at any time ”.

For this reason, the lawyer Fernando Monsalve asked that the Carabineros deliver to justice the names of all staff that participated in the control of the agenda of the events, along with informing how many drones there were in the sector.

Monsalve noted that the videos show the construction of an exculpatory story.


Zamora is in preventive prison accused of pushing the adolescent AAA towards the bed of the Mapocho River, for which he was formalized for attempted murder.

Further, your discharge was completed since he had not declared to the institution that he was carrying a video camera.

Check the document:

This article describes an ongoing legal process

There is a possibility that the charges will be dismissed at the end of the investigation, therefore The accused (s) should NOT be considered guilty until Justice dictates sentence against him.
(Article 04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure)



[ad_2]