[ad_1]
The Radical Party (PR) bench withdrew the motion of censure that it presented yesterday to the Chamber table Low for not allowing the telematic vote of two deputies who were in a session in person, but who had to withdraw.
The deputy Camila vallejo (PC) and the deputy Cristóbal Urruticoechea (RN) were the parliamentarians who They were not allowed to vote in the session of October 15, on the Comprehensive Child Sex Education project, because they started the discussion in person and ended it online.
The censorship was introduced moments after the approval of the admissibility of the constitutional accusation against the now former Minister of the Interior, Víctor Pérez – resigned ex post-.
The problem and what surprised the opposition parties is that This motion will be presented this Tuesday, because that was not discussed or coordinated, assure the representatives of the banks.
Due to this, a complication was foreseen for this political sector, since they would have to rush an eventual agreement, first to align all the votes to throw the table that Diego Paulsen (RN) currently leads and along with that, to look for the consensus names for Tuesday’s election, if it occurs.
Likewise, although since they lost the Chamber table in April, despite having a majority, the opposition agreed that it was not the time for censorship.
But the radical deputy Marcela Hernando He defended that “we are a vehicle for the expression of all the banks” and stated that “no bank chief can say that he had no idea that the table was going to be censored; they had been talking for quite some time, and I say it on behalf of my bank boss. “
And although “they had asked for it to be delayed because the moment was not the most opportune, unfortunately the opportune moments will never exist,” he said.
There was not much agreement
However, from the Christian Democrats, the head of the bank, the deputy Daniel VerdessiHe said he was surprised that nobody informed him and that the opposition has not made a collective decision regarding the censorship against the table headed by RN Paulsen.
“As head of the bank we have not had any conversation prior to the constitutional accusation regarding censorship. Many asked me if we had any agreement, and I categorically say no reference to the issue of censorship. We were surprised, “he said.
“It was something absolutely untimely, which was not discussed with anyone. I must say it clearly”, said the deputy Ivan Flores (DC).
“I hope it is withdrawn and then we will talk about whether there is merit or not, but thus, point blank, in the middle of a constitutional accusation, it seems to me that it is absolutely reckless “, added.
Along the same lines, the deputy of the Humanist Party, Pamela Jiles, expressed her annoyance with the PR action.
“I have no reason to censure the table that Mr. Paulsen runs. They know perfectly well that I am the antipoid of that table, but I find it tremendously irresponsible what just happened in the room. It is also putting all of us who have worked together for this accusation in an embarrassing and unacceptable situation, “he emphasized.
After that, there was a meeting of opposition leaders to evaluate the course of action. The parliamentarians suggested to the radicals to withdraw the censorship since, as is the current situation, in the vote this Wednesday it was likely to be rejected. Finally, the PR agreed to withdraw the action.
