[ad_1]
The former contestant of “Pasapalabra”, Egor Montecinos, revealed that in 2019 the teacher Ledy ossandon, known as “Soa Ledy”, proposed to do a pact to distribute the prize that was delivering the Chilevisión program at that time.
“Weeks before (the contest) @LedySoa contacted me with a questionable proposal, to say the least. His idea was to form a pact in which, in case of winning one of the 4, we would distribute the money,” Montecinos explained in his Twitter account, attaching screenshots of the conversation with the woman from Calama.
“It’s a lot of money for a single player, I think it would be ideal if the 4 of us could take a fraction of the pot”, Ossandón proposed, according to WhatsApp images.
The event occurred in mid-2019 for a section called “The Fantastic 4”, where emblematic participants of the program met to compete again for the millionaire well, which at that time was bordering the $ 350 million.
“This type of agreement displeases me a lot,” Egor explained about his refusal to the agreement, adding that “it is not because of having to share a theoretical prize, but because the inevitable tensions and conflicts of interest“.
The former participant concluded by saying that he made this information public due to the appearance of Ledy Ossandón in the strip of the rejection option: “it is opportune to show what their true convictions are”, he indicated.
In the weeks before @LedySoa (who was also involved) contacted me with a questionable proposal, so to speak. His idea was to form a pact in which, in case of winning one of the 4, we would distribute the money. 2/5 pic.twitter.com/PLmkZUj0FN
– egorovoto approve (@egoroboto) October 22, 2020
“Soa Ledy” he replied
After Montecinos’s publications, the teacher responded on her Twitter account, where she acknowledged the proposal and assured that “There are those who judge me for wanting to share an award”.
“Nothing to hide, I even stated on screen that it was a lot of money for one person,” he added.
Ledy Ossandón also questioned the negative comments he has received for his support for the rejection and said that “when there are no arguments, personal attacks come.”
Now there are those who judge me for wanting to share an award. NOTHING to hide, I even stated on screen: “I think it’s too much money for one person.” Why are some people SO upset that I vote REJECT? In short, when there are NO arguments come personal attacks.
– Soa Ledy (Pasapalabra😃😃), Teacher CALAMEÑA💪💪 (@LedySoa) October 22, 2020
[ad_2]
