The gross errors of Piñera’s “Zeta Plan”, which were warned by another intelligence report during the outbreak



[ad_1]

In the hours before President Sebastián Piñera stated that the country was at “war against a powerful enemy”, the Army Intelligence Directorate (DINE), led by General Guillermo Paiva, delivered through the now former Minister of Defense, Alberto Espina, report No. 2, dated October 20, 2019, in which a “battalion of 600 agents” of the Venezuelan and Cuban intelligence – who would have entered Chile clandestinely – was attributed the responsibility of various insurrectionary operations in the country that gave rise to the October revolt, which led to a social outbreak.

Watch Piñera’s “Zeta Plan”: the DINE report on the foreign threat that made the President speak of war

As commander of these operations, the military intelligence identified Pedro Carvajalino, or Karvajalino –as it is usually written in RRSS–, as the head in Chile of the SEBIN (Bolivarian National Intelligence Service) in charge of the insurrectionary offensive in the national territory. This military hypothesis, to which former minister Espina fully adhered, was supported by the statements that Carvajalino had made on social networks on October 19, where he celebrated the Chilean social outbreak, which were quickly viralized by the anti-Chavista community residing in Chile , who repudiated and denounced the agitator.

Contrary to what is maintained in the DINE report, which placed this subject as head of “the government Chavista organization Zurda Konducta,” Venezuelans in Chile knew perfectly well that Zurda Konducta is a television program and that Carvajalino is its host and also a fanatic Twitter supporter of Nicolás Maduro. The posts that were generated at that time denounced that Carvajalino was in the country, as he himself had sustained through a photoshopped image, where he was seen posing in front of the Palacio de La M0neda.

This photograph, recorded in the military report as evidence of his presence in the country, in addition to being false, contrasted with another, this time real, of this character in Argentina. In fact, as a result of the effervescence generated by these posts on the part of the Venezuelan community residing in Chile, the PDI – at that time – quickly came out to deny their entry into the country.

However, in a parallel report from the National Intelligence Agency (ANI), it is first clarified that Pedro Carvajalino is not a Venezuelan citizen, but a Colombian, born in Barranquilla in 1983, and that only in 2009 he moved to Venezuela “for the death of his teacher and friend Alfredo Correa, “alleged” persecuted by the Colombian Government.

As an appreciation, the civil intelligence maintains in its report that in Venezuela this person does not have the profile to be an intelligence agent, since no serious agency or intelligence service openly publishes their actions, strategies and, in addition, on social networks with your real name. “This subject is a trend in social networks, he shouts and publishes all his alleged actions of agitation and organization, a situation that is probably a communication strategy on the part of the Government of Nicolás Maduro to exacerbate his capacities or to adjudicate actions that are not generated by him.”

Sao Paulo forum

The inclusion of this youtuber in the military report that was delivered by the DINE to Piñera was based on a larger hypothesis, which sought to explain that the events of social effervescence and acts of violence generated since October 18 were directly related to the Forum of Sao Paulo, held in July 2019 in the city of Caracas, Venezuela. It is clear from this report that it was there that the outbreak in Chile was forged and that certain people who participated in this event participated in the organization and direction of the demonstration activities aimed at destabilizing the Chilean constitutional order.

In the ANI report, aimed at correcting the military assessment –which was looking abroad for the internal causes that led Chile to experience the social outbreak of October– it was argued that “in relation to what is indicated in the antecedent and that says relationship with the Sao Paulo Forum and the participation of members of parties and movements of the Latin American left, aimed at stimulating and supporting the protests of social movements and, among others, that show solidarity with the Chilean people faced with an alleged presidential agenda aimed at guarantee profits for the business community, it is possible to indicate that there is not enough background or evidence to establish that from this activity (Sao Paulo Forum) the events developed since 10/19/19 in our country were organized or planned, much less affirm that these events are articulated and directed from the government of Nicolás Maduro. However, through open sources it is possible to sustain an advantage from the Venezuelan government of the current events of social effervescence to claim the organization of these and to generate an impact at the international level in relation to their capacities and strategies, in short, to demonstrate something that it is not. “

The evidence for DINE

As evidence of the participation of Venezuelan citizens as organizers of the demonstrations in Chile and of the disturbances generated in the wake of the massive concentrations, in the report Nº 2 of the DINE –which was presented by General Guillermo Paiva and Espina to President Piñera– it is identified to the Venezuelan citizen known on Twitter under the name of “JUDITH BELANDRIA” as an organizer of coordination and calls to participate in these acts of violence against the Chilean Government. Said accusation was made on the basis of a publication made in the days prior to the outbreak and in which it called for a protest on October 20, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. in the Paseo Bulnes sector.

This alleged evidence by the Army, which placed Judith Belandria as the leader of the demonstrations in Chile, was distorted after the DINE report, after identifying that Josefina Judith Belandria Aldana, who has a temporary visa for Refugio, is a well-known anti-Chavista activist and anti-mature.

Moreover, it was found that the call to demonstrate in Paseo Bulnes did indeed exist, but the posting dated from March, that is, seven months before the social outbreak. At that time, Belandria’s call was to express its support for the Venezuelan people in an activity called “A Candle for Venezuela”, which was led by Guarequena Gutiérrez, representative of Juan Guaidó in Chile and a fervent opponent of the Maduro regime.



[ad_2]