Young man exposed an unfaithful man in a jewelry store: he bought rings for his wife and lover | Society



[ad_1]

An American ‘tiktoker’ named Zoe roe It became viral in the last for a detailed account, exposed in that social network, about how he exposed the infidelity of a man, after he went to buy rings at the jewelry store where he worked.

Roe, 22, explained that the incident occurred in early October and the subject was about 45 years old.

“So, I work in a jewelry store and today a man came in looking for a gift for his wife for their 10-year anniversary ”, He began by saying in the video that he has more than seven million views.

According to The Sun, the situation continued seconds later, when he asked to make another purchase with a different credit card.

“He ended up picking a piece that said ‘My beautiful wife’ and I said, ‘Anything else for you today?’; and he said: ‘Not that is all for her, but I want to make another purchase using a separate credit card, and could you create a different account for me?’ counted.

@zozoroe

What a good day to take care of other women, this happens too often. ## fyp ## whydomen ## storytime ## CTCVoiceBox ## DayInMyLife ## OikosOneTrip ## funny ## viral

♬ original sound – Zoe Roe

“I said, ‘Sure, what are you looking for?’ and he told me: ‘Do you have something that says’ girlfriend ‘?’ and I said yes, “he added.

After that came Zoe’s “play” against the buyer, hinting that she had changed the package rings.

“So I packed everything well, put them in their respective bags. He had her mark a ‘K’ for Kristin on the bottom of his wife’s bag and an ‘L’ for Laura in the bottom of the bag for his girlfriend, “he said.

“Got damn! I just remembered that his wife’s name is Laura and his girlfriend’s is Kristin. I must have mixed up the bags, whoops! ”, he indicated between laughs.

Although the young woman’s story generated laughter among her followers, there were also people who criticized her actions, stating that “she should not meddle in marital problems.”

For now, Roe has not counted if the man has returned to the store to reproach him for what he did.



[ad_2]