[ad_1]
The Ovation medium assured that the judge was convinced of his appreciation of the play, which was confirmed by the referees in the video assistance.
Less than a day after the defeat of Chile on your visit to Uruguay at the beginning of South American qualifiers heading to Qatar 2022, the atmosphere of controversy surrounding the match is maintained, after the penalty that favored the Red and that the referee Eber aquino dismissed.
And now, details of what would have been the content of the conversation between the Paraguayan judge and those in charge of the VAR are known from Uruguay.
As assured Ovation, the reason that Aquino did not review the obvious hand of Sebastián Coates, was that he reached a conclusion similar to what he saw live, after asking attendees.
“According to the information provided to Ovación, in the audio that Chile is requesting to hear about the dialogues recorded between Aquino and the VAR members, it is absolutely clear that the Paraguayan international asked two specific questions and the responses received were related to his primary appreciation of Coates’s play“, they detailed.
These consultations, according to the Uruguayan media itself, were the “distance between hand and body” and the “player action“, referring to whether what the Sporting Lisbon defender did was intentional or not.
Given this, the VAR pointed out that “the arm was close to the body when the ball hit“.
Finally, Ovación ruled that all these situations were the final reason why the Guaraní judge did not attend the VAR.
“Due to these observations and following the VAR protocol, it was no longer necessary for the referee to go to review the play.“, closed the medium.
IT MAY INTEREST YOU
[ad_2]
