[ad_1]
The VAR continues to generate controversy at the start of qualifying. This because he did not collect a clear penalty from Sebastián Coates in 85 ‘. What would have changed the score in the duel between Chile and Uruguay.
Before what happened, several raised their voices. Former selections such as Claudio Bravo, Gary Medel and Jorge Valdivia were the first to unleash their fury against the Paraguayan whistle.
Meanwhile, Reinaldo Rueda decided what was politically correct. When consulted, the DT replied: “No words.” Of course, always with respect to avoid any sanction from Conmebol.
Experts confirmed criminal
After the final whistle, Pablo Pozo commented on what happened on the centennial field. The former referee explained that Sebastián Vegas’s penalty was well collected in the first half. He also explained that it was a serious mistake by Paraguayan Aquino.
I’m angry. It is a move that can be analyzed by the VAR. It seemed criminal to me. It is collectible. There is an extension of the arm. Of 10 penalties, 9 are charged “, he explained to CDF.
Pablo Pozo, former FIFA referee, analyzed the controversies of @Uruguay vs. @The Red:
“It seems criminal to me that they did not charge Chile” #AllTechnicalSounds #ClassificatoryxCDF 👇 pic.twitter.com/RxSySGNu7Q
– CDF (@CDF_cl) October 9, 2020
[ad_2]
