[ad_1]
Chile stood with personality in the Centennial before Uruguay at the beginning of the qualifying for Qatar 2022 but, despite this, he came empty-handed after more than questionable charges by the referee Paraguayan Éber Aquino.
The Red He played with an absolutely patched team, full of casualties, but that showed good work on the part of Reinaldo Rueda despite the fact that a long time ago I did not have a grip of these characteristics for various reasons.
Arturo vidal was the great figure of the Red one, appearing everywhere, while Francisco Sierralta took position with everything in the defense and, despite the play of the last goal that could have another destiny, that does not tarnish his good performance in the general.
The match ended 2-1 in favor of La Celeste with a questionable penalty of Sebastian Vegas and a shot of Maxi gomez when the meeting was leaving, while Alexis Sanchez scored for the Red. However, Chile was able to get up with a very clear penalty (if he used the same criteria for the one he charged in favor of Uruguay) of Sebastian Coates after launches of Victor Davila, but the Paraguayan Not here he pretended to be crazy and didn’t even go to see her at the VAR.
Without further ado, we leave them with him Chile vs Uruguay analysis by qualifiers heading to Qatar 2022:
Gabriel Arias: He had no major interventions except a ball where Nicolás Díaz was not shouted and he took it to the corner in the first half. Good drainage after a stopped ball near the end.
Paulo Diaz: He started on firm footing, a great closure to Giorgian De Arrascaeta, some insinuations in offense but he delivered badly, leaving the ball where the penalty play originates. In the second half he asserted himself more, with more poise and a better mark and start.
Francisco Sierralta: Well, firm, he took three balls with potential danger overlooked, with personality. Perhaps “the” mole of his great presentation was the clearance of head very to the center to Maxi Gómez in the final goal, but it would be unfair with his good performance. Ask for a t-shirt.
Sebastian Vegas: He started in tune with Sierralta and tried to make a good start. Unfortunate in the penalty where he bounces before. It was also stated in the complement.
Nicolás Díaz: Somewhat tense in his debut during the first half. Federico Valverde burst the crossbar on his side and sometimes goes up and takes a long time to return, as in the play of the goal. In the complement, yes, it was affirmed. He deactivated a very clear one-counter bomb after an uncollected foul on César Pinares and ended up exhausted. It is option without a doubt.
Arturo vidal: The best with differences. Tremendous physical bellows and covered the entire field. In defensive matters, impeccable for high and low. Perhaps that deployment made him miss a bit in offense, but he continues to be at a world level.
Claudio Baeza: It was difficult for him to cover the width of the court defensively, being assisted constantly by Arturo Vidal in the first half. In the complement it gave the sensation of standing and giving a better presence.
Charles Aránguiz: It started something imprecise when it is the first exit towards the offensive. Disconnected for his usual level, but in the second half he spent more hook and, in the first, he enabled Alexis for the goal. Things that have those of their quality even if they do not make a good game.
José Pedro Fuenzalida: Very willful, a runner and trying to be attentive to De Arrasacaeta in the first half, but he showed little for a ball in depth and to be an offensive weapon for his sector.
Eduardo Vargas: He had a couple of approaches from Sebastián Coates’s side at first. He did not manage to connect much with his teammates despite a couple of balls that he tried to filter.
Alexis Sanchez: It is constantly hooked to be an aid, both in the center and on the left side. At times he gave the impression of not entrusting the ball to his teammates better outlined by the sides, but when he had one left, he resolved quickly with a point just like against Brazil in the 2014 World Cup. He continues to score and mark his presence.
(68 ‘) Víctor Dávila: Somewhat disoriented at first, with little depth and, in the end, he starred in a play that will be marked for a long time, when he took a good cross that was stopped with his hand by a rival and the referee became crazy.
(68 ‘) César Pinares: Perhaps it was not the change to a changed profile when the party asked for something more speed. He tried to connect but couldn’t do much.
(82 ‘) Enzo Roco: He came in because of Nico Díaz’s injury and was almost filled with glory with a combed ball in the last of the game, but Martín Campaña took it out.
Reinaldo Rueda: He stopped an absolutely patchy team, with casualties, without rhythm, that was not known and that, pound for pound, could even be for the ballot against, but he made it work very competently, with a lot of personality and achieving good performances in players that begin to appear. He should have brought at least one point and ended up empty-handed for those inexplicable things that, it was assumed, with the VAR were going to end but that have only worsened in some cases.
