[ad_1]
Three months after the disappearance of Fernanda Maciel, who was found a year later in a warehouse near his home in Conchalí, Doubts still arise regarding his cause of death, the hours prior to his murder, or whether there are more people involved in the crime.
The thanatologist from the University of Chile, Dr. Carmen Cerda, hired by the family of the young pregnant woman, assured CHVNoticias that “He found no footprints or signs indicating that the young woman had been strangled”, in contrast to the report of Legal Medical Service that reported that the cause of death had been asphyxia by strangulation.
The expert took photographs of the excavations at the site where the body of the young woman was found, took samples of different types in order to elucidate how the events occurred.
Explained that “There are not the elements to support the diagnoses of what they say“, Although he did not rule out that it could have been” suffocation, that is, they had covered his face with a pillow, something like that. It could be, because it doesn’t leave marks ”.
Could have been moved
One of the doubts that remains is whether the body was always in the winery’s patio. Questions arise because of its conservation status and other factors that are still being investigated.
“There could have been a manipulation of the body after death, In other words, at the time she died, they could have changed her place, for example, ”the professional estimated.
The above is supported by the little biological evidence found in the cloth in which the young woman was wrapped. Which, in the opinion of the plaintiff attorney, Pedro Díaz, “It is not consistent with the crime that was committed.”
Another incongruity, according to the family, is that the toxicological test did not reveal any traces of drugs or other substances, despite the fact that Fernanda Maciel constantly smoked marijuana.
According to what is indicated by the Prosecutor’s Office to the same medium, only The results of the psychological expertise of Felipe Rojas, the only defendant, remain to present the accusation.
Similarly, they announce that the next few days would be the results of the expert opinions ordered by the complainant, which could reveal the participation of other people in the murder of the young woman.
[ad_2]
