[ad_1]
The former prosecutor also accused the political world for the silence in the case of Ponce Lerou – ATON
The reduction in fines of US $ 60 million just US $ 3 million for Julio Ponce Lerou took out welts in the ex-prosecutor Charles Gajardo, who made the comparison with the costs of the constituent plebiscite.
“Is the plebiscite expensive? With the fines that were lowered to Ponce Lerou, 5 plebiscites can be financed“wrote the lawyer, who for days has been upset by the decision of the Supreme Court.
Gajardo continued and was categorical in stating that “it is a reminder of the amount of this slam to all Chileans” and added “how cheap it is to be a scoundrel in Chile“.
In addition, the former prosecutor has criticized that few of the political world have come out to criticize the ruling, since “Ponce Lerou’s money financed until 2013 most campaigns, including the last presidents of the Republic, Bachelet Y Pinera“.
It should be remembered that the president of SQM He was accused of being the ideologue of the Cascades case, for which he benefited with US $ 128 million at the expense of small shareholders. The SVS received a fine for 1/3 of the amount of the operation, something that the constitutional Court declared unconstitutional.
Does the plebiscite cost expensive? With the fines that were lowered to Ponce Lerou, 5 plebiscites can be financed. A reminder this October 5 of the amount of this slam to all Chileans.
How cheap it is to be a scoundrel in Chile.– Carlos Gajardo Pinto (@cgajardop) October 5, 2020
Loading…
Check the following article
[ad_2]