[ad_1]
The US justice determined a temporary blockade on the order of the president’s administration Donald trump that prohibits Google and Apple from offering the TikTok application, so the platform can continue to be downloaded in that territory.
Was the magistrate Carl Nichols who issued the temporary injunction to suspend the veto at the request of TikTok. This, after the White House qualified as “Threat to national security” to the application, claiming that its Chinese parent spies on behalf of the Beijing government.
Until the closing of this note, he did not publish the opinion of the judge, so the reasons that led him to make the decision are unknown.
The ruling came after a hearing in Washington, scheduled after an emergency appeal filed by Tiktok, scheduled for 09:30 local time.
The Trump administration sought to prohibit new downloads of the application from midnight, and that current US users had access only until November 12.
The judge rejected TikTok’s request for suspend the ban on November 12.
In an unusual Sunday phone hearing, Nichols listened to lawyers for TikTok, owned by the Chinese company. ByteDance, argue about freedom of expression and national security.
For the lawyer John hall, a ban would be “punitive” and shut down a public forum used by tens of millions of Americans.
In a document presented before the hearing, lawyers for TikTok said the ban was “arbitrary and capricious” and would “undermine data security” by blocking updates and fixes to the app used by some 100 million Americans.
The company also said that the ban was unnecessary because negotiations were already underway to restructure ownership of TikTok to address national security issues raised by the government.
Government attorneys argued that the president has the right to take national security measures, saying the ban was necessary due to TikTok’s ties to the Chinese government through ByteDance.
A government report called ByteDance a “spokesperson” for the Chinese Communist Party, arguing that he was “committed to promoting the agenda and messages” of the party.
“The president determined that (China’s) ability to control this data posed an unacceptable threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” argued the government in its presentation.
[ad_2]
