[ad_1]
The deputy of the Democratic Revolution George Jackson It was defended after that the Ethics Commission of the Chamber of Deputies and Deputies agreed to sanction after its said by the “donation” of half of your salary, when it is rather a mechanism of collective savings to finance the party.
The commission established that the deputy’s statements “constituted a communication deception where an altruistic spirit that did not exist would have been implied ”.
In conversation with Bío Bío Express, the parliamentarian from the 10th district of the Metropolitan region indicated that “there are many serious things, starting with the world upside down, the Penta bench chasing those of us who did not pass our hat to that company and we prohibit them in fact in contribution of the companies and reserved ”.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, he specified that the most serious thing is that “an institution such as the Ethics Commission is corrupted for political purposes, in this case of parliamentarians of the UDI and the ruling party.”
“It is public knowledge that since 2014, since we presented the project to reduce the parliamentary diet, we have said publicly and conspicuously on many occasions (…) that with half of the parliamentary diet we contributed to our political project and to improve parliamentary work, and we show it with many tests ”. added.
According to Jackson, these tests led the commission’s technical secretariat to say that “There was no reason to sanction.”
For this reason, he announced that “we are not going to stand idly by because it violates the law, fundamental rights and the regulations of the Chamber of Deputies. It is a scandal (…) an absurdity ”.
“They suggest that there was fraud and that I tried to deceive the population to make it appear that this was something charitable, when they will never be able to find any statement from me suggesting that this was going to a charity. Here there is a clear fact of political use by those who financed themselves illegally, those who marched through the courts with their leaders and parliamentarians convicted of illegal financing, who sent them the indications of the projects by email ”.
Instead they, he explained, “as we have autonomy and we contribute to our own political project so that it does not depend on the companies, as we are strange creatures for them, they want to try to play the tie.”
Regarding his sayings
In relation to his questioned sayings in Vertigo, the deputy insisted that before and after the program, he replied that “I give it to the political organization to which I participate.”
However, this detail was not specified in the television program, arguing that “I was not prepared to talk about it, I was talking about a bill, I was talking about anything else and a person who obviously had mental health problems rebuked me, that he was medicated (…) and I did not want to confront her ”, alluding to Eduardo Bonvallet with whom he starred in a controversial confrontation over the reduction of the salary of parliamentarians.
“If I could go back in time, I would use another word, I would use contribution and if they had asked me what he does with that money, I would have given the same answer that I have given to the journalists themselves”, acknowledged.
To close, he announced that they will file an appeal for reconsideration because “the evidence is lapidary in our favor.”
Check out the interview below:
[ad_2]
