[ad_1]
This Monday, the Fourth Guarantee Court of Santiago maintained the precautionary measure of preventive detention for Hernán Calderón Argandoña, who is currently being investigated for his father’s alleged frustrated patricide.
In this way, the court rejected the request of the defendant’s defense, which asked that he be transferred from Santiago 1 where he is currently in the Health Area fulfilling a preventive quarantine for coronavirus.
The decision comes after the father of “Nano” Calderón, the lawyer Hernán Calderón Salinas, will requalify the complaint against your child last week, removing the qualification of “parricide” and leaving it as a “Crime serious injuries in context of domestic violence.”
During the hearing, which was not broadcast by the Judiciary as it did on other occasions, Calderón Salinas represented himself and changed part of his first statement, assuring that he is convinced that his son “did not want to kill him.”
“I intervene in the dual capacity of victim and plaintiff, and in this context I want to make it very clear to the Court that I have not been pressured nor am I acting in a situation of a father’s condition,” said the lawyer at the hearing, as stated The latest news.
Likewise, he stated that regarding the events of August 11, when Calderón Argandoña attacked him in his department, he has “The total conviction that the accused did not come to kill me.”
“We discovered through the (security) cameras that when he arrives at my house he brings a container of brake fluid and throws it on top of my car. What person who is going to commit a parricide on the twelfth floor is going to damage a vehicle that I would never know did? “, he asserted.
Meanwhile, the lawyer also assured that the injuries he received that day “were two scratches.” “There was no injury and my right hand has an absolutely minor injury. I have all my fingers working ”, he assured, which is contrary to the first version delivered, where it was said that the injuries to one of his hands were serious.
At that time it was said that he would have cut two tendons, so he would have mobility problems in that limb.
The lawyer also added on Monday that the blade of the corvo with which he was attacked “measures 8 to 10 centimeters. If my son had come to commit patricide, he would have cut my body; I have nothing neither on my face, nor on my neck, nor on my body ”.
This statement is also the opposite of the first, where he stated that his son’s intention was to stab him in the stomach, which did not happen thanks to his reacting on time, he also said that Calderón Argandoña would even have wanted to tear tissue from his hand “In order, I assume, to amputate it.”
At the hearing, Calderón Salinas also referred to the day his son threatened him with a firearm, and that according to his first statement, the 23-year-old “He enters the bathroom in an evident state of uncontrol, pointing the muzzle of the weapon against my chest saying: ‘I’m going to kill you.
According to his account at the time, his son looked into the room and then at him, “with an attitude of pulling the trigger,” but at the last minute he turned the gun to the left.
On this occasion, meanwhile, he asserted that “Hernán Calderón Argandoña lived in my house until that day, he did not come with a weapon that he brought from outside. He went into his safe in his bedroom, takes this gun, goes to the bathroom, aims at me from the bathroom door. He placed me, and when I was going to shoot, he shoots towards the other bedroom, towards a mirror in the main bedroom ”.
Regarding his statements, he also said “it is indisputable that one is with adrenaline, with pain, with the impression of an attack, with a rage that my son had not even called his father. But it is very different when the days go by and I converse with the only two eyewitnesses. Neither of them saw in Hernán Calderón Argandoña the intention to kill his father “,.
But despite his new testimony, he assured that he does not intend to desist from the complaint, although he does requalify it. “The accused has a responsibility and has treatment, at least, to face. But beware of the abuse of rights “, he claimed.
According to Calderón Sr., “the right should not be abused against a defendant, who committed a crime and who has to answer for him, but who is the queen of precautionary measures, the most serious, the most burdensome? it is preventive detention ”.
“Undoubtedly there are lots of cases that a defendant, with far more serious facts than those faced by Hernán Calderón Argandoña, enjoy the precautionary measure of total house arrest, and even more, that I would agree, that he had psychological treatment impulse control ”, he closed.
[ad_2]
