René Otero in the documentary Boys State.
Photo: Apple TV +
Midway through Boys State, Robert MacDougall admits that, despite having just given a speech that babies are being killed before they have a chance in the world, he is not actually anti-abortion. Robert, a strained 18-year-old with the lush moon of a Richard Linklater protagonist and the unintentional self-assurance of someone who has gotten everything he wanted so far in life, runs for office in the mock government program where ‘ t he shares. And he is winning – which, for him, means trading in his personal faith for those who will play better with what he considers his audience to be. “This is a very, very conservative group we have here,” he informs the camera in the side of a private interview. “My attitude about abortion would not go well with the boys who are there, so I have chosen to choose a new attitude.” “That’s politics!” he explained, and then, with an uncharacteristic flutter of doubt, he changed that with “… I think. ”
Boys State, an enormously captivating documentary by Amanda McBaine and Jesse Moss, would perhaps be described as a film about 1,100 teenagers who are all trying to figure out what politics is. Set in Austin, it observes the Texas iteration of an annual event that the American Legion has been organizing around the country since the 1930s. It’s divided by gender, and one of the reasons McBaine and Moss did not choose Girls State instead is that, in 2017, Texas Boys State made national headlines by voting that the state should secede – a decision that one state member (to as they ‘re called) speculation began as a stunt and escalated somehow into a topicality. It’s the kind of call you might expect for a bunch of bored, hormonal kids locked up in conference rooms and government buildings for a week. Then again, you could just as easily apply the description of what happened to the last presidential election. The boys of Boys State can be a very temporary community just as likely to make dick jokes and fall into push-up competitions as to talk about policies and campaigns on their own behalf, but the filmmakers do not have to strive for their subjects as a reflection of the American to make political id.
Those subjects, however, have the capacity to surprise. The 2018 Texas Statesmen skewed white and, as Robert notes, conservative, but perhaps not as much as before, and McBaine and Moss put their thumbs up on the scale by focusing on a quad of participants who had a more diverse experience reflect. Robert is the most famous guy, the most popular kid who tries to kiss charisma in a win for governor, the top position in the program. His main opponent in the primary – the participants are randomly sorted into two parties, the Federalists and the Nationalists, and tasked with creating platforms – is Steven Garza, a solemn progressive whose mother was undocumented and who transforms when he calls for speaking ahead of an audience. The chairman of her party, the Nationalists, is René Otero, an amusing acrobatic liberal who recently moved out of Chicago and who thought he “could be a delegation for black people here.” On the Federalist side, the relentless Ben Feinstein, who has a Ronald Reagan action figure and who sees his success as one with two amputated legs, is proof of the work ethic he believes the country is on. is built. He proposes to run for governor himself, but if that fails, it turns out to be the power behind the throne, and he works on behalf of a candidate who compares everyone admirably to Ben Shapiro.
Boys State belongs to that realm of documentaries, e.g. Spelling en Mad Hot Ballroom en Cheer, who take their structure and pull their tension out of the leagues they crown. It is a subgenre that tends to the crowd — and sometimes the nice ones, especially if its subjects are teenagers who participate in adopted activities for adults. Boys State absolutely helps his trap from recording children on a pop stage of Capitol building and proposes “the relocation of all Prius drivers to the state of Oklahoma.” But McBaine and Moss are the team behind 2014s The overnighters, a wrenching film about the North Dakota oil boom, and they are interested in something beyond the contrast of adolescent faces and adult subjects – or, for that matter, serving simple optimism about Gen Z as these young men occupy the cusps of their political life.
They find it in Ben and Steven, and the opposing schools of thought they imagine when it comes to how they should approach an election. Ben opts for an unapologetic “shock and awe” strategy that includes a flash on social media and an accusation of bad faith of bias against René. Steven is conducting a heartbreakingly serious campaign at the level that includes many one-on-one conversations and honestly talks about his support of divisive issues. What happens when they clash is a reminder that these teens are not being removed from the current climate, even if most of them are not yet old enough to vote. They are just as attacked by uncertain facts and displays of trust, by tribalism and attempts to rise across the table as anyone else. And that, Robert? That’s politics.
See everything
