We already know that the new MPX powered by the M1 chip has impressive performance that beats almost all current Macs with Intel processors, but what about Windows PCs? PC World Compare Microsoft’s Surface Pro X with Paul’s new M1M MacBook Air and the results put the Surface tablet far behind.
Although Windows runs on ARM based machines, many of them are not currently available to customers. The MicroS .FT’s Surface Pro X tablet is one of them – an ARM chip built in partnership between MicroSFT and Qualcomm.
Directed by PC WorldOne of the major limitations of Windows on ARM machines is that the operating operating system was restricted to running emulated 32-bit X86 software. In other words, the system is not capable of simulating and running 64-bit applications built for AMD and Intel processors.
32-bit software runs at a significantly lower performance – and Apple got rid of OS Cause K.Talina in 2019. At the same time, Apple Play has introduced the Rosetta 2 technology for the new M1 Mac, which translates every software software originally created for Intel Max into an ARM binary that runs better on Apple Play Silicon-based computers.
Microsoft recently released a beta version of Windows featuring an imitation of 64-bit X86 software, but nevertheless, the performance is not even close to the new Max with M1 chip. In the GeekBench 5 test, the Surface Pro X was overtaken by the new M1M B Kabuk Air and was also behind a cheap HP Pavilion laptop running with an Intel Core i5 processor.
Another test was performed with an open source handbrake of transcoding videos. While the new MBQbook Air with M1 chip converts 12 minutes of 4K video to 1080p H.265 format in about 23 minutes, the Surface Pro X ARM took 2 hours to complete the same operation.
The SQ1 pulled with a frame of about a second, 12 minutes of 4K video, Tears Steel took about two hours to transcode steel to 1080PH.265 format. Apple’s Pal MB Book M1 easily blows up the Surface Pro X.
At the end of the day, with the improvements that MicroSF makes on Windows, ARM machines are at a disadvantage compared to the M1 Mac. Based on its tests, PC World “The Windows Arm Arm needs a miracle to achieve the performance of the new Mac with the Apple Pal silicone chip,” he says.
But it’s hard to believe that further development will bridge the huge gulf of influence between Windows on the Arm and Apple’s M1-based Max. In six months, Microsoft will be able to boast that its emulation performance has improved significantly. But without the combined miracle of a better CPU from Qualcomm or another Arm Chipmaker and the continuous improvement by the combined MicroSFT, the future of Windows on Arm looks bleak.
Interestingly, the developers were able to emulate Windows 10 on the M1 Mac and make the Mac better in GeekBench testing than the Surface Pro X running the original Windows 10 on ACM.
FTC: We use revenue generating auto to affiliate links. More
Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple News:
