“In a series of studies in this case, a vague infection in children may have been associated with quiet COVID-19 transmission in the community,” the researchers wrote in a new study.
“In this study, the authors estimated that 85 infected children (% alone) would have missed out using a testing strategy focused on testing therapeutic patients alone.”
This newly published research adds further evidence that casting huge net cams when it comes to contact tracing is one of the key strategies to reduce viral spread.
“We know that children often show fewer or fewer symptoms of COVID-19. We also know that they are not immune to the virus, and they can get very sick. Testing exposed individuals who have not yet been exposed to COVID-19. Contact tracing, which helps to identify and assist others at risk of infection, is crucial to what symptoms may show, “your president, Dr. Sally Goza, said in a statement.
Difficult to diagnose
In those patients, 20 – or 22% – showed no obvious symptoms and remained asymptomatic throughout the study.
The other 18 children – or 20% – were hypersensitive, meaning they didn’t look sick at the time or eventually had symptoms.
In total, more than half of the children – kids1 children or 78% – showed symptoms, including fever, cough, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and other symptoms, including loss of smell or taste. The duration of symptoms varies from one to 36 days.
“This suggests that even mild and moderately affected children remain pathological for a long time,” Debiasi and Delney wrote in the editorial.
Statistics show that only 8.5% of patients were diagnosed with Covid-19 where symptoms began. Most often – .2 66.5% – patients with symptoms had symptoms that were not known before they were diagnosed, and 25.4% developed symptoms after diagnosis.
“This highlights the notion that infected children with or without symptoms are more likely to continue their normal activities, which may contribute to viral circulation in their community,” DBAC and Delney wrote.
The virus remained in the respiratory tract
The study found that the genetic material from the virus in children could be detected over an overall period of 17.6 days. Even in children who had no symptoms, the virus can be detected on average for 14 days. The study said that even in children, the virus lasts longer, so the date of initial infection cannot be identified.
However, this does not mean that children were spreading the virus, experts say.
In addition, “sensitive molecular detection methods can detect viable, infectious viruses, but can also detect renewable or fragments of RNA without the ability to transmit,” DBAC and Delney wrote.
Further research is also needed to determine whether similar findings will emerge in a larger group of children in other parts of the world.
Still, the new study provides information that could be used by public health officials when considering the spread of the virus in schools, according to Debiasi and Dale.
“A surveillance strategy that only tests therapeutic children will fail to identify children who are quietly spreading the virus around their community and schools.” “In regions where the use of face masks by the general public is not widely accepted or used, asymptomatic carriers can serve as an important reservoir that facilitates peaceful spread in the community.”
Your Goza’s Friday statement reinforced the need for systematic, comprehensive tracking.
“Without data and transparency, science and medical professionals are hampered – and families are harmed – because we lack information that helps us understand how the virus can be easily transmitted to others and how to prevent it. . “
.
