Blümel: ÖVP asks for “a complete clarification of the WKStA approach”



[ad_1]

Have Blümel’s “accused rights” been violated?

The ÖVP would like to know, for example, how the defendant status could reach the media in advance. A journalist had aired a corresponding document through Twitter before the house search. “WAre the accused rights of Gernot Blümel violated and who is responsible for it? “The turquoises want to know.

Steinacker demands a “total and immediate clarification”: Why do you put that in the room there was supposedly a date with Johann Graf and Sebastian Kurz, although this date never took place Explosive: A few days after Neumann sent the suspicious message to Blümel, an interesting name appeared on the appointment calendar of Novomatic founder Johann Graf. On July 25, 2017 the name “Kurz” was registered. It should be a confusion of names. Consequently, it is not Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, but Martina Kurz, the daughter-in-law of the wealthy founder of the company, Graf, who is referred to.

“Who is responsible for the misconduct?”

Other key points of the investigation: The basis for the registration of the house is a donation and an appointment, although according to the ÖVP neither of these existed and Blümel has already clarified this. In addition, the WKStA would use “formulations in the files”that contradict the requirement of objectivity of the investigating authority, because they correspond 1: 1 to the political diction of the social democracy or the party of freedom “.

According to the ÖVP, Blümel “was able to present all the accusations as false within 48 hours”. How does the Minister of Justice intend to “proceed”? Y: “Who is responsible for the misconduct and what are the consequences? ”

The fact that confidential files of the WKStA constantly reach the media, even though only one in 100 accused by the WKStA is convicted, is equally problematic: this causes “professional harm” to the people who are in life public. The ÖVP even locates a “massive intervention”on the right to respect for private and family life ”according to article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

[ad_2]