After the Attorney General’s Enforcement Framework was published, the U.S. The government is moving to regulate cryptocurrency


United States Attorney General (AG) William Barre said the recent release of the Cryptocurrency Enforcement Framework will help law enforcement fight elements using digital currency for an illegal end. Created by AG’s Cyber-Digital Task Force, the framework provides law enforcement with a bar that provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging threats and enforcement challenges associated with the growing prevalence and use of the term cryptocurrency.

The release of the framework comes at a time when U.S. regulators are increasing pressure on Bitmax executives and John McCaffy to be the latest casualty of the new approach. Nonetheless, top US officials, including FBI Director Christopher Ware, pay tribute to this revolutionary technology, which they say is important and promising.

In his remarks, Ware suggests that the new implementation structure is designed to target individuals who facilitate illicit trade using cryptocurrencies.

“In the FBI, we will first see the risks first when criminals are turning to the important technical promise of cryptocurrency to an illegal end.” The director explains that his agency’s staff observed that “criminals (now) use cryptocurrency to try to prevent us from complying with a wide range of investigations.”

Cryptocurrency is preferred when settling transactions of illicit goods sold on the Dark Web. In addition, ransomware criminals are also preferred to pay cryptocurrencies because they believe this is difficult to track and trace.

Meanwhile, a member of the Cyber-Digital Task Force, Brian C. Rabbit, again praising cryptocurrency and blockchain, says they “offer a tremendous promise for the future.” However, Rabbit still adds to this favorable view of cryptocurrencies “it is important that these important innovations follow the law.”

Rabbit makes it clear that there are red lines, which law enforcement agencies will not hesitate to respond to:

While the Department of Justice (DOJ) and its partners are committed to supporting the advancement of legitimate cryptocurrency technologies and uses, we do not hesitate to enforce the laws governing these technologies when necessary to protect the public.

Another member of the task force, Beth A. Williams praised the release of the Cryptocurrency Enforcement Framework, which reflects DOJ’s extensive collaboration with local and international partners. Williams concluded that the cooperation was “for the benefit of legitimate cryptocurrency users and the general public.”

Meanwhile, in the document, the DOJ says it considers the use of anonymity-enhancing cryptocurrencies (AECs) such as Monero, Zackash and Dashsh “as a potentially dangerous activity that is an indicator of possible criminal behavior.”

Surprisingly, the DOJ also says that the operators of Mixers and Tumblrs may be “criminally responsible for money laundering, as these services are specifically designed to conceal or conceal control of nature, location, source, ownership or financial transactions.”

However, despite the release of the implementation framework, the DOJ says it already recognizes the importance of working with international partners and international partners to enhance the implementation plan enthusiastically.

Do you think DOJ’s cryptocurrency implementation framework will help reduce illegal activities? Tell us what you think in the comments section below.

Tags in this story
Bitmax, Christopher Ware, Cryptocurrency Regulation, Dash, DOJ, FBI, John McAfee, John McAfee, Moniro, Ransomware Attack, United States Attorney General, William Barr, Czech

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Vicky Kons Mans

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer fur or offer fur recommendation to buy or sell or any products, services or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. The Company or the Author is not directly or indirectly liable for any loss or damage caused by or in connection with the use or reliance on any materials, goods or services referred to in this article.