[ad_1]
Pakistani cricketer Umar Akmal may have to serve only a fraction of his three-year ban, according to a report by India today That being said, the detailed verdict may score part of your suspended verdict.
A source close to PCB told the Indian agency that the short order does not say how much, if any, of the three-year ban is suspended, leaving the door open that you will only have to serve one year of your prohibition.
“People are coming to conclusions about the three-year ban, but the detailed order has yet to be released. Akmal could get a three-year ban with a two-year suspension or something like that,” the source reported.
The source added that the suspension would give him some time to reflect on his past misbehaviors and possibly give him time to improve.
However, if Akmal fails, he will definitely be expelled for all three years.
“He could get a suspended sentence on his three-year ban because this will also test him as an individual to see how he behaves and behaves in the future,” the source said.
“When most of a ban is suspended, the player must be careful with his behavior or he could end up being expelled throughout the ban.”
Once the detailed ruling is resolved, Akmal can appeal the panel’s decision within 14 days of the hearing.
Umar Akmal banned for all years all forms of cricket
The PCB had banned Akmal for three years from all forms of cricket on Monday, and found him guilty of corruption charges.
“Umar Akmal delivered the three-year ban on all crickets by the Chairman of the Disciplinary Panel, Mr. Justice (retired) Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan,” the Pakistan Cricket Board said in a tweet.
Akmal had struggled with the board after he said in an interview that the fixers offered him $ 200,000 to drop two installments in one of the games. The cricket player had also claimed that he was offered money to skip matches against India.
“I was once offered $ 200,000 to drop two deliveries. They also offered to skip matches against India, ”he had said in the interview.
The hitter also said he was approached during the ICC World Cup, including the 2015 edition that was played in Australia and New Zealand.
However, Akmal had not mentioned whether he had reported this to the anti-corruption unit or not.
In accordance with ICC anti-corruption code 2.4.4 and 2.4.5, players are required to report all corrupt approaches made to them during any event and failure to comply carries a minimum penalty of five years.
