[ad_1]
For Zelda venter 
1 hour ago
Pretoria – A house of at least R13 million, R1.5m for furniture, R80,000 a month for the maintenance of her two children and R 50,000 a month for herself for the next five years.
These are some of the lawsuits of a renowned actress in the divorce proceedings against her world famous DJ husband.
While the name of the DJ is known to the Pretoria News, a Johannesburg judge who ruled after the couple’s legal disputes only referred to the case as M vs M.
This is because Divorce Law prohibits divorced couples involved in legal proceedings from being identified.
The wife told the Johannesburg High Court that, apart from the other running costs her husband has to pay, she also wanted another car, of the same standard as the one he now has, on the fifth anniversary of their divorce.
But their divorce has been stalled for some time, as the couple cannot agree on some of the issues.
The wife started divorce proceedings in 2019. The separated couple agree that their marriage has broken up, but cannot agree on the financial aspects of the separation.
In addition to her other demands, the wife also wants the husband to pay her medical, dental, hospital surgical, ophthalmic, orthodontic, and prescription pharmaceutical expenses, for five years from the date of divorce.
Although the husband accepted the responsibility for the maintenance of the children and some other expenses, he, among others, opposes the amount that she claims for the children, as well as the alimony that she demands for herself for the next five years.
The wife said in court documents that her husband was extremely wealthy, earning up to R100 million a year. This is not disputed by the husband, who also admits that the children must reside with his wife, since he “travels the world to practice his profession as a world-class disc jockey.”
The husband is said to be considered the second richest musician in Africa.
The parties entered into a customary marriage in community of property in May 2011. In January 2017, they entered into a civil marriage.
Before entering into a civil marriage, they entered into an antenuptial contract in which, among other things, they agreed that upon dissolution of the marriage, the husband would pay the wife an agreed amount of R4m in full compliance with all his patrimonial obligations to the defendant. , including alimony for the spouse. The wife, who is contesting the legality of the antenuptial, told the court that she wanted to appoint a forensic auditor to carry out a forensic investigation of the defendant’s foreign and local assets.
She also wanted a thorough investigation to determine the value of the “joint heritage” that, according to her, still exists between the parties and in which she has the right to share.
He also disputes the validity of the civil marriage.
Judge PA Meyer said the issues could not be determined at this stage as the wife must first be given an opportunity to investigate her husband’s financial affairs through a forensic accountant, if she so wishes.
[email protected]Pretoria News
[ad_2]
