[ad_1]
“President [Tsotsi] He said executive-related charges had to be dealt with, ”Ngubane said last month. “He said that Mr. Koko was caught on camera on a sexual escapade with a co-worker at Eskom and that Mr. Matona did not investigate this matter.
“The FD [financial director] Ms. Molefe had met someone who had submitted a public offer and had a discussion with the person during the evaluation of the offer. These are the reasons why he wanted us to accept the suspensions. “
But Molefe, who attended the same meeting, gave his own unique version of events when he testified in commission Tuesday.
“The issues of suspensions were not even touched. If we had discussed suspensions at that meeting, you couldn’t have signed [the meeting’s minutes and resolutions],” she said.
The meeting resolution, prepared by an outsider who had no position at Eskom, consultant Nick Linnel, which was sent by Myeni, does not address the issue of suspensions.
The defender of the evidence leader Pule Seleka said the commission had turned to Tsotsi to explain the contradictions.
“We tell Mr. Tsotsi that there is no explicit reference to suspensions,” Seleka said.
[ad_2]
