[ad_1]
Mkhwebane has now asked the justice committee, which holds both the NPA and the public protector, to intervene in the confrontation.
“We are not moving forward on that matter because of what the NPA says is interference in the case, its refusal to submit the requested documents due to the sensitivity of the case and its challenges to the legal authority of the public protector to investigate allegations of mismanagement. in terms of the Public Protector Act and the constitution the issue at hand, ”Mkhwebane said, adding that the language used by the NPA when removing his post was inappropriate.
“The language the NPA uses in correspondence when responding to our requests for assistance is inconsistent with the spirit of collegiality expected of state institutions, which have the same goal.
“I hereby appeal to the honorable members to assist us. It does not help to cite information on the subject of an investigation when another state body in the accountability value chain already has possession of it and could simply share it with us.
“Also, we do not investigate the same aspects of the matter. They look at criminal conduct, while we focus on mismanagement, ”Mkhwebane said.
The public protector also recorded her dislike for state institutions that take her reports for judicial review or simply ignore her corrective actions.
Again he asked the deputies to intervene.
[ad_2]
