[ad_1]
With the international media and mainstream media criticizing Meghan Markle from all directions, the Duchess was recently warned not to go back to trial against the British tabloids.
Many royal experts believe that Meghan Markle is under threat of facing an even greater violation of personal privacy if she plans to go through with her lawsuits.
Many have even dubbed this potential privacy breach the ‘Streisand effect’ and fear the Duchess is biting off more than she can chew when it comes to these legal proceedings.
Mark Stephens of British firm Howard Kennedy spoke Uk express on the possible prevailing issue and was quoted as saying, “If I was advising Meghan I’d say get out now. This is another hole below the waterline.”
Stephens believes that “the risk is that the way you handle your reputation, what you allow to be in the public domain and what you don’t, are now things that lawyers will take into account in cross-examination. The stake is huge because at the moment its reputation is not particularly damaged. “
“She has had an invasion of privacy and feels strongly about it, but the reality is that she only has one downside here. The more she protests about wanting to protect her privacy, the more people are going to investigate how the Streisand has cured the effect of amplifying the Positive PR and negative the other PR.
For the unspoken, the Streisand effect is a tumultuous phenomenon in which those who seek to hide or protect their privacy, conversely, end up causing more consequences and, therefore, end up incurring more unwanted advertising.
It is named after American artist Barbra Streisand and her debacle of the early 2000s, where more attention ended up falling on photos of her Malibu home than was intended.
[ad_2]
