[ad_1]
Tsotsi, who was leading the process, told Marokane that the decision was made on March 11 to suspend it.
According to Marokane, Tsotsi was clear that he was not going to be suspended for wrongdoing, but the company would set up a “fact finding” investigation and the idea was that executives should stay home to allow the investigation to do its job without the executive interference. .
When they switched to a suspension letter that had been prepared for him to sign, Marokane identified “inaccuracies” that contradicted what Tsotsi had just said.
It contained lines like “you [Marokane] we have made several representations and we have considered them “and” intentional manipulation of the electrical system.
Marokane refused to sign the document with these “inaccuracies”. He said that this forced Tsotsi and his team to cross out certain lines, and said that when everyone agreed he signed and went home.
‘I was ignored’
After processing these events, six days later, Marokane wrote to Tsotsi to implore the Eskom board to allow her to help the planned investigation with her work.
He testified that he was ignored.
Two days later, he unleashed his lawyers in another letter to Tsotsi, now pointing out the “procedural injustice” of his suspension.
Once again, Tsotsi didn’t bother to entertain Marokane.
[ad_2]
