[ad_1]
Lobbyist Afrikaner AfriForum on Wednesday joined the Department of Basic Education’s decision to make matrix students rewrite two leaked exams.
AfriForum said it will assist four enrollees Wednesday in an urgent court request at the Gauteng division of the High Court in Pretoria.
The court subsequently gave Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga until 12 pm to hand over the full record of the proceedings that led to its decision, confirmed AfriForum lawyer Willie Spies. The citizen.
“All matters will be heard simultaneously at 10 o’clock tomorrow [Thursday] tomorrow, ”Spies said.
The South African Union of Democratic Teachers (Sadtu) was due to file court documents opposing the department’s decision on Tuesday.
AfriForum said the court request was aimed at reversing the decision of Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga.
ALSO READ: Legal battle not good for tuition students, rewrites ‘only fair decision’, says UEP
Math essay two and physical science essay two were leaked last week, with the first essay scheduled for December 15 and the second for December 17.
Most unions and educational organizations oppose Motshekga’s decision that all matrix students rewrite exams.
AfriForum argued that Motshekga based its decision on an interim report, which reportedly revealed that only 195 students had accessed the leaked documents.
“The leaked documents were also found to be accessed by the majority of students through a WhatsApp group of high achievers, a group selected by the department for ‘preferential treatment and support,’” said AfriForum’s educational rights advisor, Natasha Venter.
Venter said it would unfairly harm the roughly 400,000 students who had not seen the leaked tests, and wrote both articles “honestly.”
READ ALSO: Class of 2020: Union, Department Facing Matrix Paper Rewrites
He said the department should focus more on “exposing the culprits who acted dishonestly by using the leaked documents and making them available.”
Venter further explained in a statement that the department’s own regulations established that if an irregularity was not the result of the actions of the student who wrote the exam, and if the candidate did not benefit from it, the exam and the given result should be scored. to know.
“Research has shown that students’ scores on final exams can be determined with 93% accuracy by studying their past scores.”
This, he said, meant there were ways to determine which students benefited from the leaked exams, and he urged the department to focus on finding these enrollees, rather than hurting the entire class of 2020.
“We cannot allow Motshekga and his department to harm students who have worked hard their entire school career, and this is because the department’s systems were inadequate in the first place to prevent questionnaires from leaking. There are better ways to ensure the integrity of the exam, ”Venter said.
This is a developing story. Updates to follow as more information becomes available.
Compiled by Nica Richards
For more news your way, download The Citizen app to iOS Y Android.
[ad_2]
